Tap to unmute

How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn't Locally Real - Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED


Пікірлер • 14 359

  • eggtart
    eggtart 5 ай бұрын +12606

    I can confirm this with my daily observations. I can place an object on my table, countertop etc. It appears stable and should not fall over. The moment I turn my back, at a random interval of its choosing, the object will fall over, or end up on the floor. Initially, I believed it to be poltergeists, but I'm now convinced it's Matthew McConaughey

    • reknaseapasa353
      reknaseapasa353 5 күн бұрын


    • Jolly Roger
      Jolly Roger 18 күн бұрын

      Oh I see, I tried to pick up a bowl on the counter, and it kept evading me, scooting accross the counter, just out of reach..that must have been Mathew. Mystery solved.

    • catherine
      catherine Ай бұрын

      but when it starts on its side, does it still fall over?

    • Hsing Yong Lee
      Hsing Yong Lee Ай бұрын


  • mauette2000
    mauette2000 2 ай бұрын +306

    I think it will be a very long time before anyone can explain what this video is trying to explain in a manner that actually does explain.

    • Travis Ambler
      Travis Ambler 2 күн бұрын

      Therefore, illusions.
      Conscious reality is a quantum system. Our mind is in a superposition where all things are possible. However, as we start determining quantum states, we lose free will, and reality becomes determined.
      That's why the scenario is impossible for you but not for me.
      Just beware that a determined reality makes you a slave to someone. If the system has to be drastically changed and you can't adapt, they will sacrifice you to maintain their system.

    • Edoardo
      Edoardo 2 күн бұрын

      @ADU Aquascaping sorry i don't understand what are you ask me for.

    • ADU Aquascaping
      ADU Aquascaping 2 күн бұрын

      ​@damyr What does it mean to exist if not to observe?

    • ADU Aquascaping
      ADU Aquascaping 2 күн бұрын

      ​@moran a'amekh What does it mean to exist if not to observe?

    • ADU Aquascaping
      ADU Aquascaping 2 күн бұрын

      ​@Simon Wallstenius What does it mean to exist if not to observe?

  • ezosoro
    ezosoro Ай бұрын +22

    I have never heard anyone explain things in such an understandable way. I need to watch more of your videos.

    • xofyck
      xofyck 19 күн бұрын +1

      @David Vaughn a quick typo doesn’t matter, bedre viter

    • David Vaughn
      David Vaughn 19 күн бұрын

      @chris Oakey are you claiming to be a physicist? Because you're spelling "lose" incorrectly 😂😂😂

    • chris Oakey
      chris Oakey 20 күн бұрын

      the beautiful example of how physicists loose track on reality. this type of detachment from reality. this is how hubbles constant was seen as relative to us, instead of relative to light slowing over time (around 0.5mm/s/year). Schrodinger's cat is miss understood as that it is both stages. his actual point was our knowledge of the cat being alive or dead doesn't change the fact that it is alive or dead.

  • Jeff Currey
    Jeff Currey Ай бұрын +41

    Maybe in another multi-verse I understand, but in this one the concept went right over my head. I will revisit this again in some other time and place.

    • Nayan Pardeshi
      Nayan Pardeshi 25 күн бұрын

      Comment that i was looking for 😃

    • Nayan Pardeshi
      Nayan Pardeshi 25 күн бұрын

      Same bro

    • Pineapple on Pizza
      Pineapple on Pizza Ай бұрын

      same dude :D maybe if im reincarnated as a phycisit

    • Michael Clark
      Michael Clark Ай бұрын

      I'm still trying to wrap my head around the theory that the universe doesn't exist and therefore we don't exist.

    • Robo Star
      Robo Star Ай бұрын +1

      Same. I'm trying.

  • John L
    John L Ай бұрын +16

    Incredibly well verbalize and explained.
    Tho for me personally, the logic part, agree disagree, has hit a weakness (relative to your own strenght at explaining so well). You've been able to explain to me what 99% of people wouldn't have been able to make me understand.
    Thanks for this video, thank you.

  • Cynthia Botsko
    Cynthia Botsko Ай бұрын +13

    Thank you for this! Clears up, for me, a lot of misrepresented popularized interpretations of laypeople with major "Tartuffe"-like confirmation biases. And, yet, you explained such technical information in a very accessible way for those of us with limited knowledge of the subject. Much appreciation!

  • Gumshoe
    Gumshoe 5 ай бұрын +7479

    I met a theoretical physicist the other day. I was surprised to learn they actually exist.

  • Rahul Chadda
    Rahul Chadda 18 күн бұрын +3

    I work with fluorescence anisotropy looking at proteins binding DNA so I really appreciated your polarizer demo- very cool! I wonder if you have made a video on double slit experiment and it's many variations esp. quantum eraser and delayed choice?

    • Schmetter Ling
      Schmetter Ling 16 күн бұрын +1

      Why are you telling us that you an an unemployed guy who didn't pay attention in high school science class? ;-)

  • Indigator Veritatis
    Indigator Veritatis 2 ай бұрын +666

    This was really good. As an expert PhD in the field of theoretical physics, I am glad to see such explanations. Just kidding, I failed pre-al in high school... but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night

    • Amy Jo Buchanan
      Amy Jo Buchanan 8 күн бұрын

      ​@HypliX' AI is Artificial Intelligence

    • Zakiya Nafisa
      Zakiya Nafisa 10 күн бұрын

      Do you really think you have all the answers being an “expert” ?

    • Diane
      Diane 13 күн бұрын

      @Matt Smith dr who!

    • PostcardTXPeeT
      PostcardTXPeeT 22 күн бұрын +1

      hahaha....I should have had a V8 🤣🤣

    • Goog Elle
      Goog Elle Ай бұрын

      I hope you were able to get up early enough for their famous continental breakfast, lol.

  • Dokgo
    Dokgo Ай бұрын +1

    It doesn't necessarily break locality if both objects are always next to each other because an object that small can be in 2 places at once. So the object that is moving to the right doesn't just exist to the right, but it also exist at least at the starting point, if not also at every measured interval when it started moving.

    • Archana Kumari Dasgupta
      Archana Kumari Dasgupta Ай бұрын

      Ok now it makes sense.

    • Artemis Trinity 33
      Artemis Trinity 33 Ай бұрын

      @TRS Juan

    • TRS Juan
      TRS Juan Ай бұрын +1

      What reality is and how it behaves cannot be understood , it can only be experienced to a greater or lesser degree .

  • OBEY
    OBEY Ай бұрын +6

    Quantum entanglement of two particles could be defined by time. One moving forward through time and the other moving backwards through time. This would give absolute duality in all things and give the illusion of being connected. The further the distance between two particles could, counterintuitively, mean the duality becomes stronger the further away they are from each other because distance = time. I'd also guess that these entangled particles emerged into the universe at the same time in the same place. Created in pairs. Or what if it's only one particle, and it is simply being observed by us from two different points in time, giving us the illusion of two particles acting in duality.

    • Quantum Mathematics
      Quantum Mathematics 3 күн бұрын +1

      @Fragile Omniscience It turned on that energy of the universe is also zero. Energy is conserved into interaction. Zero is universal value cause it can be positive as much as it is negative or either positive or negative at all. Also there is two realities of which first one never happened and other one is never going to end. etc. the time is zero, there is no more time left and the time is never started so it is zero - are equal in value.

    • damyr
      damyr 3 күн бұрын

      This! What exactly are those "entangled particles"?? The whole video/theory starts with and is based on "entangled particles". As no one gives any explanation what those particles are, and how they even came into existence, it's impossible to understand the rest of the video.
      The video starts with one particle splitting into two particles... Firstly, how is that even possible?? Are particles freaking amoebas or something? It doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

    • Fragile Omniscience
      Fragile Omniscience 19 күн бұрын +3

      ​@Quantum Mathematics That's reasonable. It's not like there is some global time metric, we just clock state change into a normed scale, and measure the magnitude of the state changes, i.e. energy.

    • Quantum Mathematics
      Quantum Mathematics 26 күн бұрын +4

      Time does not exists. It is conserved into particle interaction and happens only when measured than it is infinite.

  • Moteh Parrott
    Moteh Parrott 18 күн бұрын +1

    This was a great video, thank you! A very interesting follow on from a video I just watched with Deepak Chopra talking about similar things from a spiritual angle, and the understanding that in the present moment we are the conscious unfolding of the universe. I know nothing about physics, so this could be nonsense, but could it be that particles are linked through time, and thus through space? Almost as though particles have always been predestined to remain connected as one whole. The universe is ‘alive’ in that sense I think, infinitely connected, and our consciousness is only a tiny expression of that, although we can sense it through deep meditation/psychedelic drugs and we are slowly uncovering it with science too.

  • Olly Wood
    Olly Wood 5 ай бұрын +1792

    I couldn't imagine a bigger flex than having gotten the Nobel Prize for keepin' it real.

    • T bone
      T bone Ай бұрын


    • C McElravy
      C McElravy Ай бұрын


    • Frankie Fish
      Frankie Fish 2 ай бұрын

      ALI G would be proud!

    • Christian Soldier
      Christian Soldier 3 ай бұрын

      @Pocnit Jesus loves you and He has a purpose and a plan for your life. He wants you to trust Him. God bless you and have a great day!

    • Pocnit
      Pocnit 3 ай бұрын +2

      @Christian Soldier I recommend 79% dark chocolate.

  • Banjo Dollo
    Banjo Dollo Ай бұрын +1

    What if you could build a Quantum computer with entangled particles but instead of keeping them in one computer , split each pair and build 2 computers , couldn't those talk to each other ?

  • DKapwno
    DKapwno Ай бұрын +9

    You know it was well explained when you're left with more questions. 👏👏👍

  • Magnanimous Martyr
    Magnanimous Martyr Ай бұрын +86

    This is the kind of situation that occurs when someone starts overthinking a subject and becoming so lost within it, that they are no longer able to recognize reality…

    • Karl Drogo
      Karl Drogo 24 күн бұрын

      @Magnanimous Martyr the thing is, that even those ideas are way above my head and those of the most people on earth and very often they are counterintuitive to our own daily experience they are actually impacting our lifes. Many modern inventions that you and i use on a daily basis like LEDs, electronics or even behavior of things in nature can only be explained by these concepts. And we are also using them to actually make our lifes better, weather its better TV screens, medical equipment, etc. So it actually has an high impact on your life
      And i think its quite interesting to try to explain those concepts to an broader audience, the problem ist that often concepts are only really logical in an mathematical sense, but that does not mean its not real or meaningless.
      Altough you can of course argue weather every new postulated particle in modern particel physics for example is really necessary but thats a whole different debate and you dont get a nobel price for some random theory. Thats the reason why the nobel price seems often a bit late for some topics

    • Abc Xyz
      Abc Xyz Ай бұрын

      Well you seem like the smartest person here, have a cookie....

    • Reynald Roque Cloma
      Reynald Roque Cloma Ай бұрын

      It's from the movie "Inecption"

    • Magnanimous Martyr
      Magnanimous Martyr Ай бұрын +1

      ​@Ken Summers Alright now, it's time to get serious. Lol

  • S D
    S D 2 ай бұрын +4

    I wonder if hidden dimensions would explain how particles can just appear and disappear randomly. Has any physicist written a paper on this?

    • Richard Clark
      Richard Clark Ай бұрын

      David Bohm's 'Implicate Order' maybe?

    • Lampetis
      Lampetis Ай бұрын

      Yeah, I think ur right. I watched a video, although I do not remember what exactly was said or the reasoning behind it. The only thing I remember is most of the video was about string theory and the strange experiment. Where they shoot out particles? Onto a slab/wall, with 2 opened slits in the middle.
      They then said exactly what u did, basically... That when they disappear, they would go to other dimensions, and not really 'disappear'.

    • Arturo Peñaloza
      Arturo Peñaloza Ай бұрын +1

      @The Wise Owl yeah I think they're called virtual particles, but they annihilite right after poping into existence

    • The Wise Owl
      The Wise Owl Ай бұрын +1

      Particles randomly appear and disappear?

  • Travis Tobbe
    Travis Tobbe Ай бұрын +4

    Love his comment on the metaphysics of cause and effect that one should expect after performing a Schrodinger's Cat Experiment.... Obviously more of a cat fan than I. Still, a good way to weed out the lower level psychopaths before teaching them how one might collapse the relative field around Sol or some other similarly dangerous trick..

  • AncientEsper
    AncientEsper 5 ай бұрын +3300

    As someone who pays attention to quantum theories, my feeling is that the universe has infinitely more details and twists the more we look. It’s basically making details up the more we look, keeping up with what we’re capable of measuring.

    • Tim Robbins
      Tim Robbins 14 күн бұрын

      @Ur'Quan I had a theory of the same...some subcontractors or different aliens jump onto the sim to create things. Different minds create different things. Some are artists...just look at the bird of paradise for example and then take the most bland example of an animal into our existence. We also have a boost every once in awhile as in the form of a genius.

    • Tim Robbins
      Tim Robbins 14 күн бұрын

      @TheeRandomDude seems like this sim added God as to limit our collective minds. What better way is there than to divide intelligence.

    • AJ R
      AJ R Ай бұрын

      @Emmanuel Aparicio Amen 🙏

    • Emmanuel Aparicio
      Emmanuel Aparicio Ай бұрын +1

      @AJ R Absolutely! You are blessed my brother! I pray to see you on the other side! God is with you; by His Spirit; to empower you! Only be strong and courageous; and be anxious for nothing. He will lead you into the fullness of truth - in Jesus name!

    • AJ R
      AJ R Ай бұрын

      @Emmanuel Aparicio so much wisdom in that verse. Many do not understand. Thank you my friend. May God continue to guide you and walk with you.

  • Ed Hernández
    Ed Hernández 2 ай бұрын +8

    What if the universe is a sort of conscience that saves energy by not "rendering" a particles properties until other particles interact with those properties.

    • Polar Bear
      Polar Bear 21 күн бұрын

      That actually would make a very intriguing hypothesis if you could find a way to formulate a test and gather results. Interesting idea.

  • Neffy Cat
    Neffy Cat Ай бұрын +4

    It's nice to meet you, friend. That is awesome and I really appreciate your sharing this information with all of us. I am very fascinated by this. I wish you the best of continued success and happiness.

  • John Shields
    John Shields 2 ай бұрын +9

    There is so much we don't know, we like to measure everything so it fits into our reality box, I think that we haven't a clue to what's really out there, we're limited to what our eyes tell us, I know there's much we don't know.

    • Luis Fernando
      Luis Fernando Ай бұрын

      @Moneybagzzz probably less

    • Moneybagzzz
      Moneybagzzz Ай бұрын +1

      We probably know as much about the universe as an ant does about the planet Earth.

  • Think_Care
    Think_Care 2 ай бұрын +7

    2:50 here is my problem. We imagine the particle breaks into two ,then when one moves to the right "we know" that the other moves to the left. So we start imagining things but then we apply known laws of physics. This makes no sense as if I can imagine it to spontaneously break into two , I can also imagine that they will start dancing the polka.
    They probably do, until we look and then they will behave differently :)

  • Dingoniner
    Dingoniner Күн бұрын

    Hey, this was a very good explanation. I enjoyed watching, thank you very much.

  • kika Hounslow
    kika Hounslow 4 ай бұрын +1071

    Great! So, next time I'm faced with a situation I don't want to deal with in life I can say it's not real and run away! Thanks Quantum Physics!

    • Christian Soldier
      Christian Soldier 3 ай бұрын

      WARNING!!!! HELL IS REAL!!! We can not hide our sins from God!! Get your heart right with God before it is too late... MATTHEW 4:17 Repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is near. Jesus Christ is coming soom!!!!!! Get your heart right with God today!!!

    • TeaParty1776
      TeaParty1776 3 ай бұрын

      @David Lafleche Existence, not consciousness, is metaphysically primary. Consciousness (eg, God) is metaphysically passive.

    • TeaParty1776
      TeaParty1776 3 ай бұрын

      @David Lafleche Distinguishing reality from ones consciousness of reality is a real need of mans life. Reality is real, is what it is, eternal, independent of consciousness and is entities that act in ways dependent on the entities that act. Change is definite matter definitely changing from one definite form to another.

    • David Lafleche
      David Lafleche 3 ай бұрын

      @TeaParty1776 I'd say that everything is real. There are three ways to judge reality: surprise, continuity and change.

  • Pedro Arthur Dutra Hüning
    Pedro Arthur Dutra Hüning Ай бұрын

    Wouldn't be possible to create two computers that can talk to each other through huge distances?

  • Pete Radice
    Pete Radice 2 ай бұрын +5

    This is great. I’m glad someone finally proved the Universe isn’t real, and that one day my computer might be faster. I’ll go back to my job now.

  • Tre Vor
    Tre Vor Ай бұрын +2

    Quantum mechanics is just like: in terms of a game, your players x and y axis on the map when located. Your character always exists, even when logged out, just because you can't see someone's character making progress it doesn't mean it doesn't. Quantum mechanics may lead to new technologies or steps towards knowing what the universe is but it really doesn't matter. It is just a measurement of randomness, like it is always there just not in a fixed position.

  • Esteban Diazgranados
    Esteban Diazgranados Ай бұрын +2

    Excellent explanation. Thanks for putting complex concepts available to “normal” people. I am an engineer and I like these topics, but it is really hard to find someone who can explain with simplicity and with beauty like this video did.

  • Ray Jones
    Ray Jones Ай бұрын

    There are definitely different laws of observation out there. Things act differently when they aren't observed almost like a simulation buffing before it's observed

  • Pericles Toukiloglou
    Pericles Toukiloglou 5 ай бұрын +625

    They way I had "understood" so far, was that according to quantum physics, the property of a particle is random until it is measured. However, if I am getting this right, whenever we measure again the same particles, the value of the property will change again, to a previously unknown value (so that it's value sometimes is or isn't 180-Δθ) . If that is the case, the value of the particles' property could be changing randomly all the time and we just get a snapshot of it's value at the precise moment that we measured it.

    • KrinoDaGamer
      KrinoDaGamer 2 ай бұрын


    • G
      G 3 ай бұрын

      @Verum Just a measurement

    • Verum
      Verum 3 ай бұрын

      @G What exactly is "observation" here?

    • G
      G 3 ай бұрын

      @Guts Well yeah, random and undetermined mean the same thing in a lot of cases. But in this particular context: A random state would be a singular state that has been randomly chosen out of many, while an undetermined state is comprised of all possible states existing at the same time.

  • Jon Doe
    Jon Doe Ай бұрын

    Since the way of observing/measuring a particle in the double-slit experiment determines what said particle will be (a particle or a wave), what would we get, if we had a way of observing/measuring, which would not influence the final state of a particle?
    Is such a way of observing/measuring possible?

  • Anthony Dower
    Anthony Dower 2 ай бұрын +6

    When I was a shop mechanic, 10mm sockets would repeatedly go to another dimension and then reappear after using the 10mm box end to tighten the faster. I don't lose tools, never been that type of mechanic; everything has its place in the box and is accounted for before the machine is rolled out. It's really the only logical reason why my 10mm sockets would vanish and then reappear later. Or maybe it was Mathew 🤯

    • Paul Couch
      Paul Couch Ай бұрын

      Having 5 or 6 10mm tools ,. Yes they do stuff in QM mode.

    • Anthony Dower
      Anthony Dower 2 ай бұрын

      @Teddie I wouldn't doubt it lol

    • Teddie
      Teddie 2 ай бұрын +1

      They communicate with 10mm spanners.

  • Michael Phelps
    Michael Phelps 2 ай бұрын +3

    Would it be possible that we are all occupying the same space and the distance isn't as far as it seems? It's just through human understanding, at this point in time, that we think the universe is so big.

    • DiZ
      DiZ 20 күн бұрын

      @Archana Kumari Dasgupta 😂😂

    • Archana Kumari Dasgupta
      Archana Kumari Dasgupta Ай бұрын +1

      Yea sure, ill be france in 5 minutes.

  • Vishal Mandadi
    Vishal Mandadi 2 ай бұрын +4

    Higher rate of coincidence should lead to a graph that is similar to graph of a square root function. However, we see a sine curve. So, either the experiment results seem to be flawed, or we didn't get the gist right. Can someone explain and clarify this?

    • ashy slashy
      ashy slashy 2 ай бұрын +1

      Einstein said its the GOD factor.

  • リコママ
    リコママ 2 ай бұрын +3

    I also have this thought of the universe where it reacts dynamically base on the observers like for example if I am not looking at something (like it is outside my peripherals and Im not thinking about it) does it really exist? or it will only manifest itself if I become aware of it?

    • Alexis Smith
      Alexis Smith 2 ай бұрын +1

      This brings the question of what is capable of observing? The universe existed before humans so who was observing before humans? Animals? What level of consciousness and deeper thinking constitutes as observation in the universe and what was going on before? Sorry so many questions I’m just interested in what you’re saying and I often manifest using the core idea of the Schrodinger‘s cat experiment. Was wondering your thoughts

    • Said Dream
      Said Dream 2 ай бұрын +1

      if the universe is in a superposition and only becomes real when you observe, that makes you the only person in your universe, and the fact that you were born without knowledge learned about the people, world the universe who were there long before you can actually observe those things, and the knowledge you have comes from it not viseversa, means the universe is real.
      or else you are the universe itself according to this Quantum theory

  • Jason Armstrong
    Jason Armstrong 4 ай бұрын +94

    Einstein (Podolsky and Rosen) weren't proven wrong. They proposed a question as a response. It just took a long time for subsequent theoretical physicist to respond. The question was so good it deserved a Nobel prize worthy answer.

    • Jim at Perfromix
      Jim at Perfromix 2 ай бұрын

      @jasonarmstrong3463 makes a legitimately interesting point here. All 8 (at the time I read this) replies are also legitimate responses, so thanks to all for the feedback. I would say that in particular the responses by @slipcaseslitpace896 and @a_diamond struck me as being somewhat enlightening in the philosophical sense. In a bit of a summary ...
      The terms Real and Realism as used in this video (and indeed, in John Bell's 1964 paper, over which all the hub-bub is about) don't have anything to do with whether or not the Universe is real in the sense of actually existing. It has to do with a certain philosophical Realist-like Flavor that Einstein instinctively wanted to have as a core aspect of any basic physics theory, and Einstein further stated that his sixth sense told him that perhaps Quantum Mechanics (as currently practiced then and now, and which he himself helped to invent) was perhaps incomplete - that is, there might be more *stuff* that we have yet to discover and that might lead to a better understanding of why the theory of quantum mechanics works so well in a practical sense. What emerged was what one might call a "philosophical battle" between Einstein's team (including Schroedinger, Podolsky, Rosen, and perhaps even John Bell to a certain extent) and Niels Bohr's team (including Heisenberg and practically everyone else). The so-called Realist team versus the Copenhagen Interpretation team (Bohr's team was initially centered at his lab in Copenhagen). For many years, the Copenhagen Interpretation seemed to win out in physicists mind share. But actually, starting shortly after Bell's paper was rediscovered (and even more so after the Bell-Test experiments by Clauser, Aspect, Zeilinger and more) lots of differing interpretations were put forth by many physics researchers (there's probably a dozen or more interpretations of Quantum Foundations, as the field of research is now called).
      I believe that initially, John Bell somewhat sympathized with the Einstein team, but in his work toward the Bell Theorem paper, he showed that the simplistic form of a Realism philosophy that Bell had chosen to represent the philosophical leanings of Einstein and his followers, actually led to a contradiction when you compared and contrasted it to the implications of Quantum Theory along with the seemingly innocuous assumption of no information travel faster than the speed of light. This contradiction essentially forms a proof-by-contradiction (that is, reductio-ad-absurdum proof) of something. What that something is, is still open to interpretation. Some people have made wild claims that it is possible for information to travel faster than the speed of light, but as this video points out, virtually everybody now agrees that the Locality Assumption (no faster-than-light causality or information travel) is not the assumption that should be thrown out to eliminate the contradiction. Most people currently point at the Realism assumption as the best candidate for assumption deserving of being thrown out. That is, most people think that Bell's Theorem is a disproof of Realism.
      But even if we go along with that trend, Bell's Theorem is only a disproof of the particular specific form of Realism assumption that Bell incorporates into his proof. It is not a sufficient disproof of Realism in general. We have not eliminated the possibility that some other slightly different flavor of Realism might exist that is, in fact, compatible with Quantum Mechanics. The key open question is, what other flavors of Realism assumption might exist that are still Realist in the sense that Einstein might say "yeah, that's what I'm talkin about!" - yet in principle (at least) might turn out to be consistent with the theory of Quantum Mechanics. My own sixth sense leans toward telling me that such an alternate expression of the Einstein-ish Realism sentiment does exist, but we just have not identified it yet; and that furthermore, the proper identification of such an alternate flavor of Realism would actually constitute the additional insights into how Quantum Theory actually works that Einstein sought.
      Also note that the subsequent experimental verification (by most prominently Clauser, Aspect and Zeilinger, with the help of many others) of the Bell's Theorem theoretical work that was was completed in 1964, does not explicitly prove that "no Realism assumption can exist that is compatible with Quantum Mechanics" (or equivalently, "all imaginable Realism assumptions are incompatible with Quantum Mechanics"). Rather, the experimental physics work that just was awarded the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics, albeit rather impressive (after all, how many physics thought experiments have eventually been converted to actual experiments?), only proves that yes indeed, there is a conflict between what the joint team of {Quantum Physics plus the Experimental Universe - these two agree} says, versus the particular Bell Realism Assumption that Bell put into his 1964 Bell's Theorem. That is, the Nobel experimental research simply doubles down on Bells theoretical proof that there is a contradiction, and our most probable explanation of that contradiction is that there is a conflict between the specific Bell Realism Assumption that Bell used in his 1964 proof, and Quantum Mechanics. Most likely, we have only proven that Bell made a bad choice of Realism Assumption. At least, that's all we know for sure. In order to prove that the idea of Realism as envisioned by Einstein and Team is actually toast, we would also need an existence proof (essentially a proof in modal logic) that demonstrates that no flavor of Realism Assumption exists that is compatible with Quantum Mechanics. As far as I know, we have not seen that yet. Furthermore, in any attempt to try to achieve the latter, one typically gets bogged down in semantics related to "what legitimately comprises a Realism Assumption."

    • slip case slit pace
      slip case slit pace 4 ай бұрын +4

      @Knuts and what does that mean?

    • slip case slit pace
      slip case slit pace 4 ай бұрын +3

      @Timothy n that’s literally the title of the video.

    • Knuts
      Knuts 4 ай бұрын +4

      @slip case slit pace Physicists dont use "real" in the same sense we do, by saying the physical universe isn't 'Real' they are saying that measuring the physical universe does not affect the universe.

    • Timothy n
      Timothy n 4 ай бұрын +4

      No one is saying it isn’t real. Something is here.

  • Malayan Grago
    Malayan Grago 2 ай бұрын +8

    There are great implications to non-locality, e.g. I can now suspect that my dreams have some reality to it.

    • fable adams
      fable adams 2 ай бұрын

      Yes the dream realm is just as real as the 3d realm in the sephiorths it is the 2nd realm in the tree of life

  • Synergism, Inc.,
    Synergism, Inc., 2 ай бұрын

    The confusing part, might be the natural language- the polarizer, in this case- as the medium. Aren’t the media, both the natural languages and the polarizations real locally? Isn’t locality the variable, neither hidden nor measured?

  • Andy
    Andy 28 күн бұрын

    Question - from the moment the photon is split until BOB or JILL take the reading can there not be interference from other forces? How would you know both photons were initially connected?

  • Matthew Hajicek
    Matthew Hajicek Ай бұрын

    Wouldn't the polarization results also be explained by the polarizing film nudging the angle of polarization of light passing through by a few degrees?

  • Lobsta1287
    Lobsta1287 4 күн бұрын

    The entanglement paradox should take into account the transit time of seperating the particles after the entanglement event.
    An uncomfortable result is whether the measurement determines the result when you are using deduction and not simultaneous detection on both of the entangled particles.

  • Travis
    Travis 5 ай бұрын +208

    I suppose this would be a great way to preserve processing power in a simulated universe. I mean, why compute anything if nothing is around to observe it? It would be better to have those resources available to be used for something else if the need should arise.

    • Rivaldo Nelson
      Rivaldo Nelson 8 күн бұрын

      @Aaron Warner I never said we weren't in a simulation. I just said that if we were, the creators are cruel.

    • Aaron Warner
      Aaron Warner 8 күн бұрын

      @Rivaldo Nelson well they would be necessary if you were trying to hide the fact it was a simulation. If I were to design a simulation and I needed to trick the inhabitants into thinking it wasnt I would start by adding things that would make you think it cant be a simulation if that's in there .

    • Maho
      Maho 2 ай бұрын

      @Menno Boes Awesome! I need to watch that

    • Pablo Tochez
      Pablo Tochez 3 ай бұрын

      It isnt a simulation if there isnt a base reality for it, simulations are ultimately limited by the energetic principles of their base reality, either by design or by nature

  • vitko mazzetti
    vitko mazzetti 2 ай бұрын

    By changing the entangled photons on one side, which will change the photons on the other side, and then designing the computing necessary to interpret that change into the information intended to be transfer, could be a way to accomplish the impossible :)

    • sean h
      sean h 2 ай бұрын

      but no, because, measuring one entangled particle does not reveal to the other particle that it was measured, and the measurement results are still totally at random

  • nxlxn
    nxlxn 2 ай бұрын

    So nice of these scientists (aka figures inside my imagination) to come up with this!

  • Tai Gill
    Tai Gill 2 ай бұрын +2

    Seems like common sense that particles are related, especially when there is a split. If we were able to create proper equipment I’m sure we could make family trees for particles

    • sk ab
      sk ab Ай бұрын

      Particle bonds make systems. When family is already a system, you don't need to go into particle scale to do so or do anything else.

  • GalliadII
    GalliadII 2 ай бұрын +2

    Yes there is a randomnes, but we can modify the odds and predict tendencies. We may not be able to have FTL communication, but if we send the signal not once but a lot of times, the probability will come very close the a desired result.
    I would want to know what would happen if we dropped one quantum entangled particle inside a black hole?

  • Michael Burke
    Michael Burke Ай бұрын +1

    I like how he explained the movement of photons they either move vertical horizontally or somewhere in between 🤔 🤔 is that like your either alive dead or somewhere in between?And how do we know there is nothing faster than light or is there nothing faster that we know of?

  • G, Oldham
    G, Oldham 5 ай бұрын +243

    I started reading quantum physics books when i was too young to understand them, about 1982 13 years old, now I'm 53 years old, and still feel i don't understand it much, but this video made me feel like i learned something over 40 years, because some of this was familiar. I have always been drawn to this, even though I'm mostly a trained engineer, and now an old man hanging out in a home mancave building a humanoid robot at a slow pace. Cool video, thanks.

    • Christian Soldier
      Christian Soldier 3 ай бұрын

      WARNING!!!! HELL IS REAL!!! We can not hide our sins from God!! Get your heart right with God before it is too late... MATTHEW 4:17 Repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is near. Jesus Christ is coming soom!!!!!! Get your heart right with God today!!!

    • Raven Ragnar
      Raven Ragnar 4 ай бұрын

      @Scott Hill My man!

    • Scott Hill
      Scott Hill 4 ай бұрын +1

      @Raven Ragnar I hear ya brother… way too many hits of LSD on one sitting and thought I was on the verge of never coming back flying through space outside of Time and throwing planets around as if they were toy balls. But in the end, overcome with peace and love, and the ego was stripped, never chased that again and enjoyed science even more.

    • V G
      V G 4 ай бұрын

      Get more insight from Ancient Indian Vedas, Vedanta etc. texts, which mentions reality of our cosmos which is in line with current Quantum Physics.

  • Here Now
    Here Now 2 ай бұрын

    I wish I knew enough to understand this - the Universe fascinates me and this kind of informed me but you know you are a non-physicist when even the explanations need an explanation!

    • Mark Welsh
      Mark Welsh 2 ай бұрын

      I wouldn't beat yourself up about it. Consider this: “If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.” ~ Albert Einstein I have a degree in physics and I don't understand this gobbledygook either. I suspect it is perhaps because it's rubbish!

  • Aylo
    Aylo 2 ай бұрын +3

    I became more confused than I was before watching after hearing you try to explain something based off “one particle spontaneously splitting into two”

  • Marishka Grayson
    Marishka Grayson Ай бұрын +2

    This property of being non-locally real implies a deeper reality that we have yet to explore, which is very exciting. The inherent uncertainty is what makes the universe so malleable whereas a deterministic view would seem to imply a static universe where no change is possible.😢

    • waldroj01
      waldroj01 Ай бұрын +2

      It implies that consciousness influences outcomes and fundamentally experiments are inconclusive because genuine objectivity is impossible as we can’t take the observer out of the experiment.

  • Ray Horn
    Ray Horn 2 ай бұрын +1

    If one could encode information during particle entanglement then FTL communication would be possible.

  • Eris Gh0sted
    Eris Gh0sted Ай бұрын +1

    I might be grossly misunderstanding both topics. But doesn't quantum entanglement sorta lend to being able to transfer information faster than the speed of light?

    • The Art Of Being
      The Art Of Being Ай бұрын

      yes. it is instant accross any distance...scarry 🙃

  • Parashar Somprabh
    Parashar Somprabh 5 ай бұрын +292

    Questions of science suddenly become questions of philosophy and psychology the deeper we move into them, science and philosophy essentially look like brothers.

    • Helen
      Helen Ай бұрын

      So quite simply put man or woman who are in a relationship have decided they will try another without letting the other know and think they can get away with it at the same time in the same space without the other realising they are living in a false fantasy world of entanglement until it is too late for them to decide they are because it is already happening extremely close and 'locally'

    • Dexter Morgan
      Dexter Morgan 3 ай бұрын

      @Abandoned Void not at all .

    • Hboig
      Hboig 4 ай бұрын

      @Abandoned Void
      Science: What nature is
      Epistemology: How we know
      Metaphysics: Why nature is
      Logic: Relations within nature
      Ethics: Why should it be so
      It's really that simple lol, none of these fields are yet dead or fully taken over the other :P

    • Enshala
      Enshala 4 ай бұрын

      @Abandoned Void Social media has made facts irrelevant.

  • Chhangsreng P
    Chhangsreng P 2 ай бұрын +3

    Thank you, so all of these weird physical thing is just a hypothetical situation of some theories being push to the limit to show that they are wrong. Also thanks for explaining how quanthum entanglement can be made, most youtuber just skip it and tell us that we magically have 2 particle that are entangled

  • Fatty Love Handles
    Fatty Love Handles 16 күн бұрын

    it's crazy how life on Earth is so precious and yet here we are, so much drama except for the few who are enjoying life to the max while others suffers to the max.

  • Cincinnati Living-with Vic
    Cincinnati Living-with Vic Ай бұрын

    the more and more they study this, the more i feel like I'm literally an avatar in a made up world

  • Kevin Martin
    Kevin Martin 2 ай бұрын

    When one measures a quantum particle & it is (say) a wave; would that particle be the same if it is measured 1 second before or 1 second after? Likewise, if 30 seconds before or after?

  • Nabi Rasch
    Nabi Rasch 2 ай бұрын +1

    I was looking at the sun once from my front door. For no reason I can explain I suddenly ran to a door at the side of the house and looked up. The sun actually wobbled before affixing itself at the proper angle.

  • SJKPJR007
    SJKPJR007 5 ай бұрын +312

    Thank goodness this had a "So what?" chapter. Whenever I read or watch items concerning quantum theory I often end up wondering if it's significance is "locally real".

    • Christian Soldier
      Christian Soldier 3 ай бұрын

      WARNING!!!! HELL IS REAL!!! We can not hide our sins from God!! Get your heart right with God before it is too late... MATTHEW 4:17 Repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is near. Jesus Christ is coming soom!!!!!! Get your heart right with God today!!!

    • James Macleod
      James Macleod 5 ай бұрын

      @Nic holas Yes and why do we worry about the weather so much?

  • Enigma G
    Enigma G 2 ай бұрын +2

    How do subatomic particles come together to make an object? I want to understand these things but as a layman it seems to me that "things", including our bodies, are different than particles behaving on their own. I have so many questions!

    • roundEarth360
      roundEarth360 Ай бұрын

      @Emmanuel Aparicio hmm...
      I had parents. No wizards, golem spells necessary.
      Also, what a bummer - being told only after one passes away, that THEN everything is amazing.
      What's the point of it all then?
      To do everything this supposed 'god' allegedly already knows we're going to do...all that will happen?
      Nevermind all the needless suffering.
      I can't speak for Enigma, but I'd sure be disappointed to find out you - the one providing an answer such as yours - is an adult. That's my opinion anyway

    • Emmanuel Aparicio
      Emmanuel Aparicio Ай бұрын

      It all starts with God… we are all made out of the “dust of the earth.” Then God allows for life to enter us… and He sets the limits and restrictions of whatever is necessary to “orbit” around our spiritual beings to make up our physical substances.
      Say we understand how these things come together; what purpose would it serve? To simply turn pebbles into gold? Or To understand reality and the God who made it in time for us to make a decision to be saved by Him before we die.
      Jesus will explain it all perfectly to those who truly want to know one day for all of eternity.

  • Kat C
    Kat C 2 ай бұрын +2

    what i’m hearing is that the improbability drive from hitchhikers guide to the galaxy is closer to reality than i expected

  • Guy from NJ
    Guy from NJ Ай бұрын

    Great vids and channel. Just found you. So glad I did. Great job.

  • Tai Gill
    Tai Gill 2 ай бұрын +1

    I have a problem with that idea as well, bc no matter the surrounding, anything that’s considered huge by literary definition will make a sound after a fall to a solid landing.

    • Ukrainian Patriot
      Ukrainian Patriot 17 күн бұрын

      Actually, air will be "moved." Of course it will. And if eardrums are around, they will hear a sound. Sound is subjective. Moving airwaves are not.

  • Live Life Love Life
    Live Life Love Life 2 ай бұрын +3

    What matters is that it still looks and feels real.

    • Wasko Peko
      Wasko Peko Ай бұрын

      @Live Life Love Life hehe, truth all the way baby.

    • Live Life Love Life
      Live Life Love Life Ай бұрын +1

      @Wasko Peko
      You are brave,
      I keep switching between red and blue pill yet 🙃

    • Wasko Peko
      Wasko Peko Ай бұрын

      I still take the red pill

  • P110 K9 Solutions
    P110 K9 Solutions 5 ай бұрын +125

    As an individual who miserably failed Algebra 1 in high school (and still can't do long division) and is effectively math challenged, you did a great job at making this easily digestible, and understandable. 👍👍👍

    • Eli Helbig
      Eli Helbig 2 ай бұрын

      @Kinetic Literally the building blocks of humans, I wonder who built them together? *shrug*

    • Kinetic
      Kinetic 2 ай бұрын +1

      @Eli Helbig Forgot to add, I think my favorite slam dunkesque argument would have to be the genetic code.
      The fact that there is literal code embedded within us should be a huge cause for concern for any atheist.
      Of course, this code came about naturally ;).

    • Kinetic
      Kinetic 2 ай бұрын +1

      @Eli Helbig Indeed, I couldn't agree more with that assessment. From the discovery that the universe had a beginning, right up unto all of the intricate ENCODE findings and JWST data, it is evermore pointing towards theism.
      I see no reason for this trend to stop.
      As to the big bang, I am totally in agreement with the aspect of it that states the universe is finite and had a beginning, but that's about it.
      The materialist account of how the bb and subsequent formation of our universe happened is where things get wholly unbelievable with things such as inflation, faster than light expansion etc. To me it's honestly just laughable.
      I'm personally a YEC so I subscribe to a literal account of Genesis, but not on the basis of arbitrary preference, it solely on the basis of scientific evidence.
      Regarding the evolution stuff, yeah, there is 100% adaptation among living organisms, but that's about the extent of it.
      I honestly have zero problem with speciation, I actually don't mind it as it fits into the post flood rapid adaptation model quite nicely and offers a purely physical mechanism whereby we can explain biodiversity in such short time.
      If you haven't looked into "hyper evolution" via epigenetic factors, that's an interesting one
      I just wish more people were made aware of this information and understood the science, it seems as if everyone still thinks that science is wholly on the side of atheism like we're in the 19th century still, without realizing that the weapon of science is now in the hands of theist. Truly sad.

    • Eli Helbig
      Eli Helbig 2 ай бұрын

      @Kinetic Yep, I'm a christian and I go to a pentecostal church as of now, and I would say that generally, many people incorrectly believe that science disproves the bible, where I see it to the contrary. To be honest, the sheer complexity of modern science, with quantum physics, relativity and the like, only affirms to me that only God would be able to make something so intricate and beautiful. So yeah, I completely agree with you, science is mutually exclusive with theism at all, and to be frank, the scientific arguments people make against the bible, are primarily based in theory, such as the big bang or evolution. To be honest, I see a lot of evidence for the big bang, given that genesis is written from the perspective of God, and our invention of a day being 24 hours doesn't predate God's creation of the world, therefore, it's entirely possible that the 6 days of creation in genesis, where actually 6 abstract periods of time.
      As of evolution however, I see evidence of adaptation as of now, which makes sense to me with homeostasis and all, but I'm still not quite convinced when it comes to speciation and evolution right now. Though I still believe, they could fit in the to genesis story.
      Also, I would recommend studying Biology for sure! I'm a second year Math and Biochem major hoping to go into Medicine afterwards, hopefully to help as many people as I can and follow in Jesus' footsteps by serving those who are less fortunate.

    • Kinetic
      Kinetic 2 ай бұрын

      @Eli Helbig Ahhh, a fellow evidential theist / Christian I assume? So nice to meet like minded people. I'm thinking of entering into biology myself in order to glorify God through it, and show others that rather than modern science being against theism, it is actually the contrary.
      So who's your favorite org? Discovery institute, AiG?

  • Josh Walter
    Josh Walter 2 ай бұрын

    So maybe I got lost a bit. But does this mean that there are actually "hidden variables" that somehow glue the particles together through their wave functions to create entanglement?

    • another creature of the sea
      another creature of the sea 2 ай бұрын

      No. The point of the nobel-winning experiments is that no *local* hidden variable theory can explain the observed results, in line with Bell's theorem. In other words, the type of hidden variable theory that could resolve what many find counter-intuitive about entanglement was definitively ruled out by these and related experiments.

  • Brian B
    Brian B 2 ай бұрын

    I'm a bit confused at the end - there is no way of inducing a spin on a quantum entangled particle? How do q-bits work, then? Shouldn't the spin of one entangled particle dictate the spin of the other? I don't see why the locality of the entangled particles makes a difference - where entangled particles are close together in a quantum computer, but somehow the entangled particles can't be captured into two separate devices.

    • Paul Couch
      Paul Couch Ай бұрын

      I would just super glue it to knob and then just twist the knob.

  • Zechariah
    Zechariah Күн бұрын +1

    What this means is basically we're all in a simulation.

  • ringod123
    ringod123 2 ай бұрын +2

    So what would happen if 2 entangled particles were observed at the same time in 2 different apparatus?

    • sk ab
      sk ab Ай бұрын

      Quantum guys don't allow another apparatus in this experiment. It's illegal.

  • John Cortex
    John Cortex 21 күн бұрын

    There was a young man called Bright - who could travel faster than light. He set off one day, in a relative way, and returned the previous night!

  • fifetojo
    fifetojo 5 ай бұрын +308

    Really well explained.
    I found this easier to follow than the PBS spacetime episode 👍

    • Christian Soldier
      Christian Soldier 3 ай бұрын

      WARNING!!!! HELL IS REAL!!! We can not hide our sins from God!! Get your heart right with God before it is too late... MATTHEW 4:17 Repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is near. Jesus Christ is coming soom!!!!!! Get your heart right with God today!!!

    • Infinity
      Infinity 4 ай бұрын

      ​Mary Antonio you can change your morality and you can allow external forces to also shape your morality. The thing about morality is that it is best explained with GOD I'm not saying that you cannot be moral without GOD everyone can I'm just saying you can't justify it without stealing from GOD. like for example "treat others the way you want to be treated" this is a quote from Jesus. Also if there is no objective truth then what you're saying is not true because how can it be true if there is no truth? If you say there is no objective morality you're saying there is no right or wrong it all depends on the viewer. let me try to explain it better.
      if there is one action that is objectively morally wrong such as torturing babies for fun or murdering six million people in the Holocaust then GOD exists. Why? Because only an unchanging moral being whose nature is the standard of Goodness can provide unchanging moral laws and obligations that are binding on human beings. Without the objective standard known as GOD's nature, everything would just be a matter of human opinion.
      Hitler, Stalin, child murderers, pedos, r-wordsss, cannibals, etc., would not be morally any different than Mother Teresa.

    • X - Force
      X - Force 4 ай бұрын +1

      PBS Spacetime is fantastic, but I think it's generally geared to an audience more familiar with physics at the nuts & bolts level. I highly recommend Sabine Hossenfelder's channel here for much more informative and accurate (sorry Dr. Miles) yet still very digestible videos on these topics, including one exactly about this Nobel Prize win and what it actually means.

  • Chinh Le
    Chinh Le 2 ай бұрын

    The universe is real by the word "photon". Quantum computer exists. It's amazing 👏 😍

  • Jen
    Jen Ай бұрын

    There is a nice photo of Michael Horne in his obituary. He loved to teach non-physics students physics!

  • David_Cop_A_Feel
    David_Cop_A_Feel 2 ай бұрын +8

    It all boils down to the question: can an infinite amount of information occupy a finite space?

    • David_Cop_A_Feel
      David_Cop_A_Feel Ай бұрын

      @Sky Cloud - Yeah, but the more you think about it, the crazier you become, until you look like Einstein with his tongue out, hair going every which way.

    • Stepan White
      Stepan White Ай бұрын

      Does space in your dreams have any measure?

    • Liquidmagma
      Liquidmagma Ай бұрын

      No, it's still a question of perceived reality.

    • Sky Cloud
      Sky Cloud Ай бұрын +4

      That's f*cking brilliant.

  • C.K.
    C.K. 2 ай бұрын +1

    If not someone could define what is "real" in the most proper human sense

    • sk ab
      sk ab Ай бұрын +2

      You know that mass is real. And vacuum is also real because vacuum was there until mass replaced it. But quantum is not real because it's in your mind..

  • ebenlabs
    ebenlabs 15 күн бұрын

    whoever does the visual presentation for this video deserves an award or a mug or something.

  • Nick
    Nick 5 ай бұрын +499

    Man Alice and Bob have had a lifetime of stories together.... they should make a scifi tv show at this point jeez lol

    • AtlasEmAll
      AtlasEmAll 4 ай бұрын +1

      Well according to Eve the eavesdropper, most of Alice and Bob's conversations are incredibly cryptic and hard to understand. That might not translate so well to a TV series.

    • typedef
      typedef 5 ай бұрын

      They should get a room.

    • Smokey
      Smokey 5 ай бұрын +2

      Add Ted and Carol into this equation and I might pay better attention.

    • jose antonio soldi
      jose antonio soldi 5 ай бұрын +1

      @Old plugin pi 0900

    • FuzzyBear
      FuzzyBear 5 ай бұрын +1

      Yeah. I wonder how big the fight was so that they'd each go to an opposite galaxy.

  • Roman Vigil
    Roman Vigil Ай бұрын

    Love the new new, keep expanding and keep an open mind.

  • Cartoonicus Studios
    Cartoonicus Studios 2 ай бұрын

    Is there a video that explains just what entanglement consists of, and how we do it?

  • FFGG22E
    FFGG22E 2 ай бұрын +2

    How do they measure spin? I've asked and asked and asked

  • James Lummel
    James Lummel Ай бұрын

    Actually, there may be a way forward on faster than light communication using entangled particles (@11:31), and quantum computers may be a part of that solution.
    The concept on how it could be accomplished is based on the thought experiment about if you had a room with an infinite number of monkeys typing on typewriters, eventually they would re-produce the complete works of Shakespeare. Questions is, out of all that randomity, how do you separate the Shakespeare from the other stuff?
    That's where quantum computing would come in (coupled with AI). If the problem is that entangled particles are random, then a large number of them could create pretty much any message you may want to transfer. It's a matter of sorting out that message from the rest of the randomity. It would be like listening to the static from an old analog television tuned to a channel with no signal and being able to discern patterns in the noise, kind of like how SETI is doing their search for other civilizations.

  • D4m4g3
    D4m4g3 Ай бұрын

    If you have a light bulb traveling at light speed and it is turned on, does one side remain dark (like the light is off) while the other side is bright?

  • DragonMasterAltais
    DragonMasterAltais 5 ай бұрын +87

    Superbly made. These particular concepts in a strange and inexplicable way, almost seem to make perfect sense. Whether or not something can be categorised as "Locally Real" has always been incredibly important, and I'm honestly impressed with the simplistic yet highly informative explanation given. This is truly exciting!

    • Infinity
      Infinity 4 ай бұрын +1

      evil only exists if goodness exists since you wouldn't know evil without first knowing goodness. Think of it like this. you cannot have shadows without light, but you can have light without shadows. So how is it that we know why good is good? if you're an atheist you don't know why it's wrong to kill a person you just know it's wrong though you don't know the reason. You see we know the universe had a beginning based on The Cosmic Microwave Background, which is "the cooled remnant of the first light that could ever travel freely throughout the Universe" it is a 'fossil' radiation, the furthest that any telescope can see, it was released soon after the 'Big Bang'. Scientists consider it as an echo or 'shockwave' of the Big Bang. this paired with the 2nd law of thermodynamics shows us that the universe had a beginning and is expanding while also winding down. Not only did the matter in the universe have a beginning, but also the forces such as space, and gravity, and quantum forces, and time we know this from general relativity which shows that you cannot have space without time and you cannot have time without space and you cannot have matter without space or time! meaning that what could have caused the big bang would have to be outside of the realm of time and space meaning it's nonmaterial ! because nothing cannot happen to create something because there is nothing to occur to create something... So how does this go back to morality you ask? well would you believe it if I told you I just proved GOD's existence? You see GOD is outside of space and time! he is the one that was the cause of the universe he was the beginning, and since he is outside space and time. He is eternal meaning there was nothing before him he was always there and always will be. Now onto morality the reason we know it's wrong to kill someone is because GOD created us with a conscience con meaning with science meaning knowledge so when we kill someone we do it with knowledge that you just killed someone. The thing about your conscience is that it is GOD given society shaped. YOU can also shape your conscience the more you do things against it the quieter you make it it's like removing the batteries from your fire detector especially if you're loving the thing your conscience is warning you against.

  • Maxime Degrace
    Maxime Degrace 15 күн бұрын

    Thank you ya Quantum physic is the way ! That is why we need fundamental research We need all the Sheldon we can have :) Just Imagine how Copernic feeling was when star gazing

  • Ziana Wind
    Ziana Wind Ай бұрын

    Please do try to answer, or do make more videos about this, cuz I feel close to understanding something but we aren’t nailing it yet.
    How does this connect to the latest Nobel in physics, i did not learn anything clear at all with what they proved or what’s the point here? So was quantum entanglement proved or not? Has it been verified that entangled particles “answer” each other faster than light?
    Also what do quantum computers actually do so far?
    I enjoyed your video learnt a few things but it feels SO Nebulous! I feel I learnt something but it’s like I can’t really say what… and I can’t say I got a clue about what the latest Nobel prize was for.
    I highly appreciate your video and all the examples you gave and it’s fun.. but please please keep working at it.. I feel like when I was learning to do math and the teacher helped me with 2 problems but then class was over and I didn’t “get” how to do it by myself though it felt so close…. Please keep making more and clearer content

  • Alice Thee Great
    Alice Thee Great Ай бұрын +1

    The most important information that I got out of this entire video is this, I’m so great that my name is used in an example in it. I feel so special! 🤪

  • peter picataggio
    peter picataggio Ай бұрын +2

    so just a random thought. Could this then explain "synchronicity" ? I am thinking more in the sense where two people at opposite ends of the planet come up with he same idea and invent the same thing with out knowing each other or having ever "spoken" to each other? I know I have lots of spiritual types speak on this subject and it would seem that this could potentially play a role of some sort, you said there was no way to do communication but perhaps it does exist. Again just my random thought...

    • This Is It
      This Is It 5 күн бұрын

      I had the same thought.

  • Jake the Pitador
    Jake the Pitador Ай бұрын

    I know that my brain doesn't have pain receptors, but it still hurts after watching this.

  • History of the Universe
    History of the Universe 5 ай бұрын +178

    This was so well done, so clear and easy to follow. Thanks!

    • Hi I am Just A CoolRandomUser
      Hi I am Just A CoolRandomUser 4 ай бұрын

      @InTonalHarmony A photo is a bosons a parricle and is weak force. Has no mass and elctomagcticefoce.

    • Waldemar Pierzchalski
      Waldemar Pierzchalski 4 ай бұрын

      @Infinity study some empathy genius

    • Infinity
      Infinity 4 ай бұрын +1

      evil only exists if goodness exists since you wouldn't know evil without first knowing goodness. Think of it like this. you cannot have shadows without light, but you can have light without shadows. So how is it that we know why good is good? if you're an atheist you don't know why it's wrong to kill a person you just know it's wrong though you don't know the reason. You see we know the universe had a beginning based on The Cosmic Microwave Background, which is "the cooled remnant of the first light that could ever travel freely throughout the Universe" it is a 'fossil' radiation, the furthest that any telescope can see, it was released soon after the 'Big Bang'. Scientists consider it as an echo or 'shockwave' of the Big Bang. this paired with the 2nd law of thermodynamics shows us that the universe had a beginning and is expanding while also winding down. Not only did the matter in the universe have a beginning, but also the forces such as space, and gravity, and quantum forces, and time we know this from general relativity which shows that you cannot have space without time and you cannot have time without space and you cannot have matter without space or time! meaning that what could have caused the big bang would have to be outside of the realm of time and space meaning it's nonmaterial ! because nothing cannot happen to create something because there is nothing to occur to create something... So how does this go back to morality you ask? well would you believe it if I told you I just proved GOD's existence? You see GOD is outside of space and time! he is the one that was the cause of the universe he was the beginning, and since he is outside space and time. He is eternal meaning there was nothing before him he was always there and always will be. Now onto morality the reason we know it's wrong to kill someone is because GOD created us with a conscience con meaning with science meaning knowledge so when we kill someone we do it with knowledge that you just killed someone. The thing about your conscience is that it is GOD given society shaped. YOU can also shape your conscience the more you do things against it the quieter you make it it's like removing the batteries from your fire detector especially if you're loving the thing your conscience is warning you against.

    • Jake
      Jake 5 ай бұрын +5

      Dislike. They proved it wasn’t locally real - don’t support clickbait titles

    • Gabe Johnson
      Gabe Johnson 5 ай бұрын +1

      @InTonalHarmony A photon is a particle of light.

  • Michael
    Michael Ай бұрын

    If something like a photon oscillates vertically, horizontally or somewhere in between, that direction is relative to what?

  • Alan Booth
    Alan Booth Ай бұрын

    what would be the limit on local causality anyway - well its the speed of light and it takes time to travel any distance to affect anything- Ive always had a problem with the idea of simultaneous measurement on the separated photons - but anyways the result points to spacetime not being fundamental being an artifact of our construction

  • someone
    someone 18 күн бұрын

    We're getting closer to being able to explain "glitches in the matrix" and "quantum shifting."

  • Fish
    Fish 19 сағат бұрын

    10/10 explanation and great editing and music!

    KKJKKJ Ай бұрын

    Everything he said just moved over my head, Not a single thing I understood

  • VisionThing
    VisionThing 4 ай бұрын +119

    But doesn’t this just prove that measuring an object can change its state (through sheer interference), rather than that it exists in some kind of limbo until measured which then “materializes” properties out of it?

    • Am Al
      Am Al Ай бұрын

      The key Word is ENTANGLED it means if state of one changes the other is ENTANGLED so it has to change by the same amount in opposite direction hence they were expecting a linear graph, even if the particle changes due to interference other has to change also. Think of 2 balls connected by string if you kick one you expect the other to change equals to the force applied however here it seems the particles are affected rather than just interference , it seems conscious observation is affecting something.

    • Yodahe Abebe
      Yodahe Abebe 3 ай бұрын

      @TheShermanTanker Um... okay, then it what state is the moon in if not in "indeterminate state"...? Explain further in plain language please

    • Yodahe Abebe
      Yodahe Abebe 3 ай бұрын

      @ue83uw6eu3ieueyehw no! we're saying the explanations given thus far sound stupid in as far as we understand. If you can explain it less stupidly, go ahead... not saying I haven't heard some good explanations on this thread. But that they beg further questions generally.

    • Yodahe Abebe
      Yodahe Abebe 3 ай бұрын

      @Dartheomus For me the reason I say it's not a simulation is because I believe we have free will. Other than our free will, I believe everything in the universe is ultimately deterministic. Our free will as humans is the only thing that is not.

    • Yodahe Abebe
      Yodahe Abebe 3 ай бұрын

      @Quillo Boom. Well put. 👏👏👏😂

  • Mr Fixit Bass NM
    Mr Fixit Bass NM 2 ай бұрын

    How do you explain what came into our reality from another reality or dimension through the star gate created at cern?

  • Allay Design
    Allay Design Ай бұрын

    Its interesting how by the end of the video you just switch everything and make the point of the video unsless, well played!

  • John Moran
    John Moran Ай бұрын

    That's happened to me on many occasions.strange universe we supposedly live in.