Tap to unmute

Witness Begins to Lose His Patience During Questioning From Heard's Attorney


Пікірлер • 8 330

  • Daigoro Wolf
    Daigoro Wolf 11 ай бұрын +9737

    Can’t believe the lawyer is using tabloid gossip as a measure of proof to gauge Johnny’s integrity. Absurd beyond reproach. Speechless!

    • Thomas Hart
      Thomas Hart 24 күн бұрын


    • Sally MJ
      Sally MJ 6 ай бұрын

      Recall, this is the defense attorney who objected to his own question!

    • Petaurista
      Petaurista 9 ай бұрын

      @Gee R not necessarily as goal of this (as I think) was not to prove Johnny misbehaved or was playing bad but that newspapers were publishing about him badly b4 Heard went there with her story. Which is kind of bs, because tabloids usually do it.

    • Gee R
      Gee R 9 ай бұрын

      It's hearsay

  • Sub Zero
    Sub Zero 10 ай бұрын +6301

    the fact that TABLOIDS were even allowed to be used as EVIDENCE is absolutely INSANE... LITERALLY the definition of HEARSAY...

    • Shawn Mayer
      Shawn Mayer 2 ай бұрын

      @brian merry different legal protocols. Two different cases.

    • jelena jelenić
      jelena jelenić 2 ай бұрын

      Yes,what a trial has wit tabloids???😤😤😤😤

    • Annette Emery
      Annette Emery 7 ай бұрын

      Really. Mag rags...credible evidence. Hearsay all day

    • Brian Merry
      Brian Merry 7 ай бұрын

      @Willzb2000 and the brothers are the same america canada. "JOKE"

    • Willzb2000
      Willzb2000 7 ай бұрын

      @brian merry im ashamed of my country's legal system

  • FitzGood
    FitzGood 10 ай бұрын +7133

    Imagine being a junior lawyer talking to a practicing attorney of 50 years like this. Man that must be embarrassing, Amber's career isn't the only one she ruined, this defense team won't see another trial anytime soon.

    • Shawn Mayer
      Shawn Mayer 2 ай бұрын

      @LoneWolfHero35 and failed miserably

    • Anonymous Human
      Anonymous Human 2 ай бұрын

      I feel bad for the Junior lawyer

    • Karama
      Karama 5 ай бұрын

      @Stephen Hodgson this aged poorly

    • I am me • 25y ago
      I am me • 25y ago 6 ай бұрын

      @Stephen Hodgson, You were saying?

    • Arun Roy
      Arun Roy 9 ай бұрын

      @skull they were assigned by their law firm

  • Patrick Soo
    Patrick Soo 10 ай бұрын +1117

    I cannot believe how absurd this lawyer is!!! Almost trying to force the witness to make a claim/statement based on articles written by others?? I mean, is he REALLY a lawyer??? If HE is, I TOO can be a lawyer!!!

    • fickle fialka
      fickle fialka 3 ай бұрын +2

      This lawyer could argue, based on Marks’ responses, that articles are irrelevant to ruining one’s reputation and extrapolate that argument into Amber’s case.

    • Josephine Gilchrist
      Josephine Gilchrist 5 ай бұрын +3

      @Gem Star And isn't he the lawyer that objected to his own question? 😂

    • Sally MJ
      Sally MJ 7 ай бұрын +2

      I believe he read the same titles to Johnny, To his comedic effect.

    • Bubba Guy
      Bubba Guy 9 ай бұрын +1

      Uhuh...and, just how versed in Bird Law and various other Lawyerings are you?

    • Caren Carlin
      Caren Carlin 9 ай бұрын +2

      He is a 🤡

  • Karlfalcon
    Karlfalcon 10 ай бұрын +8033

    This trial is a perfect example of the old saying: Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.

    • Araunah
      Araunah 8 ай бұрын

      I love it! Never heard it before, thanks for sharing

    • The Amber Heard Playlist!!
      The Amber Heard Playlist!! 9 ай бұрын

      @le be press on Amber's glowy coral face

    • le be
      le be 9 ай бұрын

      @The Amber Heard Playlist!! where is that?

    • Aspen Rose
      Aspen Rose 10 ай бұрын


    • Van Zwam
      Van Zwam 10 ай бұрын +3

      @The Amber Heard Playlist!! Hunting for clicks again eh? Don't bother, the algorithm doesn't distinguish between 100 and 120 views. And then, if "the only video you need to watch" turns out be an unintelligeble audio tape that you put in the wrong context, calling it the ultimate proof that AH is right, and saying that anyone opposing this is a misogynist... Then, viewers will only leave dislikes. Not good for your algorithm shananigans.

  • Shaymus
    Shaymus 10 ай бұрын +337

    I love this guy. The lawyer is using tabloids, literal pieces of teen gossip, and this guy is just dealing with him like he's a snarky child (which, at this point, all of AH's lawyers are).

  • Tom
    Tom 11 ай бұрын +22210

    Can’t believe this guy is a professional lawyer. He doesn’t even let the person finish their answer before asking another question. Every time he asks a question you can tell he doesn’t even know if he should be asking it.

    • SoCal Kevin
      SoCal Kevin 10 ай бұрын

      This specific lawyer is a professional troll. No boundaries, no ethics, no honor, but most importantly no shame. The ultimate internet troll except he's IRL.

    • K-Arcanine Trainer
      K-Arcanine Trainer 10 ай бұрын

      @ORDINARY MEMER the goal is to get the jury to see your side of the situation, then add to the fact that this guy needs to make an impact cause it ain't gonna be telivision recordings for the jury 6wks from this testimony, there's sooooo much more complexity than a guy being mean and rude cause he feels like a sore loser only a week into a 2month trial lol you know how much these ppl slept? Would yall ppl be this nasty to a firefighter or a police officer? these ppl defend you and yeah amber sucks I bet this dude will tell you amber sucks but you gotta help your client win the jury that's US Court, jury of your peers, interpretation of the law.

    • megi deda
      megi deda 10 ай бұрын

      neither does camille, but no one cares bc she's on johnny's team

    • Doone Watts
      Doone Watts 10 ай бұрын

      Obvs went to Fox School of Law with Carlson and Hannity

  • Ancient Humor Tracer
    Ancient Humor Tracer 10 ай бұрын +2020

    I now have a different opinion about her lawyers it’s not just that they’re bad lawyers it’s that her case is so full of inconsistencies & lies it’s impossible to get a clear side across and not look insane.

    • #JohnnyDeppIsARapist!! #JohnnyDeppesracista
      #JohnnyDeppIsARapist!! #JohnnyDeppesracista 8 ай бұрын

      -Come over here and see this content whereI I have got a transcribed recording from the 7th day of the trial, of Johnny Depp chasing Amber Heard with a blade

    • DBeazRN 3
      DBeazRN 3 9 ай бұрын

      @Rita Snow You’re right. He certainly tried his best - that’s for certain. There’s a couple of clips where she turns, looks at him, smiles and right when she turns back, he looks down at her notepad, closes his eyes and shakes his head. The man truly did not want to be there.

    • Rita Snow
      Rita Snow 9 ай бұрын

      @DBeazRN 3 i think he did a decent job, given he seems to have a conscience. Elaine, though?
      Sorry, she stunk.

    • DBeazRN 3
      DBeazRN 3 9 ай бұрын

      @Ancient Humor Tracer EXACTLY!!! Agree 💯%

  • José Luis Guillén
    José Luis Guillén 10 ай бұрын +1239

    The lawyer was trying to make him lose his temper and say something like: "Well, articles are articles and whatever they said isn't really that important" therefore implying that what AH wrote wasn't that meaningful to JD career after it was published. Glad he didn't fall for it.

    • Babicka Fantastica
      Babicka Fantastica Ай бұрын

      EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT AT THE TIME! We should be lawyers

    • Harshitha Keerti
      Harshitha Keerti 2 ай бұрын

      But the witness was smart he said Hollywood has drawn a line for SA and DV

    • Sally MJ
      Sally MJ 6 ай бұрын

      I loves his lying about Netflix being a joke.

    • Anaguq
      Anaguq 8 ай бұрын

      @mila851 Same here

    • Royalty Rich
      Royalty Rich 9 ай бұрын

      @Ric Zen 🤣

  • Relax in Nature استرخاء  في الطبيعه

    Whether he wins or loses, his and his legal team's demeanor has won the internet and he can live in peace. If there is any justice in this world, he should win handily. But knowing how the law works, they may even screw this over

    • Akaf Eman
      Akaf Eman 6 ай бұрын

      @John Bloss he won~ yaayyy~

    • Relax in Nature استرخاء  في الطبيعه
      Relax in Nature استرخاء في الطبيعه 9 ай бұрын +1

      @farinaa Thank you so! 🙏🏼

    • farinaa
      farinaa 9 ай бұрын

      @John Bloss not much! All he needed was AH and friends' testimony. Truth wins always 😉

    • farinaa
      farinaa 9 ай бұрын +2

      @Relax in Nature استرخاء في الطبيعه your channel is great.

    • ExtremeHeat
      ExtremeHeat 10 ай бұрын +2

      @Jayneet Chheda lmfao... She fired her first PR team too. Probably cause they demanded that she pay their salaries instead of donating them..I mean pledging them to charity.

  • Kevin J
    Kevin J 10 ай бұрын +263

    Their entire case is built on tabloids, hearsay and bullying tactics; only allowing their narrative to be filled when questioning, but letting their "psychologist" spread rumors and drone on for hours regurgitating Amber's story. If she wins I give up

    • Cas S
      Cas S 9 ай бұрын

      @LP.Shakur lol you must be so cool

    • LP.Shakur
      LP.Shakur 9 ай бұрын

      @Cas S cheap shot or a observation?

    • Nayan Nbg
      Nayan Nbg 10 ай бұрын

      @TheBlackLodge ok

    • TheBlackLodge
      TheBlackLodge 10 ай бұрын

      @Nayan Nbg Yeah you're very obscure because you're one of a kind.

  • Christian Sahayanathan
    Christian Sahayanathan 10 ай бұрын +139

    Never paid much attention to JD before this whole saga.. but must say, becoming a huge fan of how he’s been able to put up with this crap throughout his life. All those complaining about his drug addiction should be put up on trial for causing it in the first place.

  • Zahra
    Zahra 11 ай бұрын +19185

    Imagine having “a journalists opinion ” as a credible source in court? Like they really having nothing to serve.

    • jelena jelenić
      jelena jelenić 2 ай бұрын

      You said everything👍👍👍👍❤

    • RogueBanana
      RogueBanana 7 ай бұрын

      *"tell me you have nothing to serve, without telling me you have nothing to serve"* moment right there

    • The Amber Heard Playlist!!
      The Amber Heard Playlist!! 8 ай бұрын

      Come over here and see this content whereI I have got a transcribed recording from the 7th day of the trial, of Johnny Depp chasing Amber Heard with a blade

    • Vidlo Vidlo
      Vidlo Vidlo 9 ай бұрын

      @Moodle Oowada you can if you are trying to make the point that those articles were the main reason for Johnny Deep to be fired from Disney, they are not trying to prove tha what the articles said was true or not but that they had a mayor impact on Disney decision; they knew they lost the defamation case already they are trying to minimize the economic compensation that Amber Heard would have to pay Johnny;

  • Terry LaGuardia
    Terry LaGuardia 10 ай бұрын +68

    This gentleman is extreeeeemely patient. Much respect!

  • Francis Mallard
    Francis Mallard 10 ай бұрын +118

    This was the best witness testimony ever. He made AH’s attorney look like a buffoon.

  • Reed
    Reed 10 ай бұрын +74

    It’s painfully obvious that, in society, there is a difference between self destructive behavior such as occasionally being too drunk and looking silly, and being the abuser in an abusive relationship.
    Heard’s lawyers are trying to equate the two, but the jury won’t buy it. They are in no way equal. Society tolerates people getting drunk and being silly, as long as they don’t hurt anyone. Society doesn’t tolerate someone being physically abusive to their spouse.

  • Billbro Baggins
    Billbro Baggins 10 ай бұрын +219

    I’ll translate for Amber’s lawyers.
    “Ladies and gentleman of the jury I’d like you to take into account the paparazzi headlines you would typically see and laugh at while standing in line at the grocery store. The ones next to the soap opera magazines? Yes, those. This should be all the proof you need right?! Please!?”
    I love how hard they try to paint their own portrait of every single witness because they have no real defense to the mountain of evidence Depp’s team has provided to prove Heard was both the primary abuser and the vindictive party involved. My favorites are the witnesses they ask a question to then try to cut the witness off when the witness refused to give a third of an answer because the entire answer, aka the truth, doesn’t play to their arguments.

    • 名無名的
      名無名的 10 ай бұрын +2

      I mean yea... that's the point that's being made? That JD had a tons of bad publicity (true or false) prior to the article that JD is suing over. If the publicity was so bad before then her article didn't do that much damage overall to his reputation and thus doesn't constitute deformation. The witnesses point is that the allegations in AH article are materially different to the other allegations in other articles because hollywood studios treat accusations of DV and SA as materially different to being drunk or high etc.

  • slightly offensive dad jokes
    slightly offensive dad jokes 10 ай бұрын +71

    a lot of people are saying how the judge appears biased with how she won't cut off Amber's judges when they make obvious mistakes, but I have to disagree I think the judge, for as impartial and educated as she seems, is having a little thrill letting heards lawyers absolutely destroy their own case themselves. they don't need a judge to stop them after every sentence to prove what a poor job they're doing, she just let's them go at it and utterly embarrass themselves.

  • XxTheMetalistxX
    XxTheMetalistxX 10 ай бұрын +11442

    Lawyer: Calls hearsay on everything.
    Also that same lawyer: Uses articles based on hearsay as evidence.

    • S Cook
      S Cook 7 ай бұрын


    • Ash
      Ash 9 ай бұрын

      @giggle_snort wait what? You guys don't know what ROTTEN means? He even capitalized it. I mean this is the MOST MOST MOST basic level of sarcasm and if you still don't get it, then it's your problem. Grown some brain cells.

    • Evelio Perez
      Evelio Perez 10 ай бұрын

      🤔 a sarcasm font!

    • Sandy Mcgill
      Sandy Mcgill 10 ай бұрын +1

      A saying in Scotland rotten by name and by nature but is it not the other guy anyway

    • Sandy Mcgill
      Sandy Mcgill 10 ай бұрын

      @Mike Hamric it's rottenarse man psml

  • Danni_VA
    Danni_VA 10 ай бұрын +118

    They said the guy on the stand is a lawyer as well, so he knows how to play the game and you tell with the way he answers questions LIKE A BOSS

    • Mike Doody
      Mike Doody 10 ай бұрын +17

      he's not phased at all. seems to enjoy it actually lmao

  • Iran Dude
    Iran Dude 10 ай бұрын +537

    “ARE YOU JUST GONNA KEEP READING THIS?” - Ambers lawyer expects this man to read and acknowledge all and everything written in rags.

    • Sally MJ
      Sally MJ 6 ай бұрын

      This comment is especially great coming from the witness.

    • MMakotaL
      MMakotaL 10 ай бұрын +2

      lol xD

  • Mahlki
    Mahlki 10 ай бұрын +244

    Seriously this lawyer is like:
    "So you are aware of Johnny's existance?
    "So you are agreeing that he is guilty"

    • M&M
      M&M 10 ай бұрын +4

      Perfectly stated!

  • its_honey
    its_honey 10 ай бұрын +32

    I literally would have had to ask the judge for a break if I were a witness, it would be so hard to hold back from cussing out someone on Amber's team. They interrupted all of the witnesses during almost every answer and had invalid objections for questions that hadn't even been fully asked. The case would have been over already if it weren't for her lawyers wasting the court's time day after day.

  • jurassic park durango
    jurassic park durango 10 ай бұрын +35

    How can a lawyer use random news articles as facts! This is ridiculous

  • W
    W 11 ай бұрын +14752

    All of her lawyers don’t let anyone finish speaking. Why doesn’t the judge stop this from continuously happening?

    • MrAlex
      MrAlex 9 ай бұрын

      @Allen C. Did I say answering fully is a crime? Don't think so. Though I don't agree with the conduct of Amber Heard + her lawyers.

    • Namtr Ng
      Namtr Ng 9 ай бұрын

      They all respect the court time, which might be the only target that was obvious for them.

    • Paul Snow
      Paul Snow 9 ай бұрын

      Because trying to get key words from them without them explaining themselves

    • Who?
      Who? 10 ай бұрын

      The judges job is to listen, if the lawyers wanted they could interject but they can see how useless the defendant's line of questioning is so they just humour them.

    • Kennypompey
      Kennypompey 10 ай бұрын

      They just out there searching for loopholes

    RICHARD GRANNON 10 ай бұрын +2394

    “No sir, Im afraid I don’t have a picture perfect memory of every specious clickbait article written in an obvious effort to dog pile Depp.”

  • Jeffrey Aguilar
    Jeffrey Aguilar 10 ай бұрын +111

    I would’ve refused Amber’s case. Even if I was a good lawyer I wouldn’t let my career get destroyed by representing her.

    • Jeffrey Aguilar
      Jeffrey Aguilar 10 ай бұрын +1

      @MayfallTribe I wouldn’t if that would end up being my last check because nobody will want an incompetent lawyer.

    • Matlin Whitten
      Matlin Whitten 10 ай бұрын +8

      I think it’s more so destroyed because they are acting incompetent and silly, not so much that they are defending her.

    • MayfallTribe
      MayfallTribe 10 ай бұрын +5

      You would if u were getting a check either way.

  • Sandy Wieringa
    Sandy Wieringa 10 ай бұрын +45

    I love how JD's lawyers are not objecting to any of this, instead letting her lawyer make a total fool of himself!

  • Anders Hebekk
    Anders Hebekk 10 ай бұрын +190

    I don’t understand how the defense objects to everything as hearsay, yet uses tabloid articles as proof!?! Those are in fact examples of hearsay!!!

    • Anders Hebekk
      Anders Hebekk 9 ай бұрын

      @Fate Ani yeah but I got over 170 likes didnt I. How many did you get? ;)

    • Fate Ani
      Fate Ani 9 ай бұрын

      @Anders Hebekk you just copy pasted a comment that was made 2 weeks before yours, from word to word.

    • Anders Hebekk
      Anders Hebekk 10 ай бұрын

      @kieran what?

    • D M
      D M 10 ай бұрын +2

      It's not hearsay. Copying from what I wrote above: There's an exception to the hearsay rule here (actually it's not even an exception -- by definition it's not hearsay). What is said in the articles is not being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in those articles (e.g., whether or not Johnny was drunk for example); rather, it's being used as an example of negative publicity. This is why Depp's lawyers aren't objecting. Trust me, they would if they could, and they have objected to hearsay many times.
      Hearsay would be, for example, Amber Heard testifying "My doctor told me I suffered a broken arm from being hit" -- because she's offering an out of court statement ("My doctor told me I suffered a broken arm from being hit") as evidence that she did indeed suffer a broken arm. Of course, if her team called her doctor, he could testify that she suffered a broken arm, since that's not hearsay.

    • kieran
      kieran 10 ай бұрын

      stolen comment

  • Cinema
    Cinema 10 ай бұрын +15

    Amber has not only made herself look like a joke of a human but also made her lawyers look like absolute clown heads for trying this hard to defend her

  • Ivan Kucerak
    Ivan Kucerak 11 ай бұрын +8185

    I just don’t understand how the defense objects to everything as hearsay, yet uses tabloid articles as proof - aren’t those a prime example of hearsay????

    • D M
      D M 10 ай бұрын

      It's not hearsay, that's why they aren't objecting. Explanation below:
      There's an exception to the hearsay rule here (actually it's not even an exception -- by definition it's not hearsay). What is said in the articles is not being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in those articles (e.g., whether or not Johnny was drunk for example); rather, it's being used as an example of negative publicity. This is why Depp's lawyers aren't objecting. Trust me, they would if they could, and they have objected to hearsay many times.
      Hearsay would be, for example, Amber Heard testifying "My doctor told me I suffered a broken arm from being hit" -- because she's offering an out of court statement ("My doctor told me I suffered a broken arm from being hit") as evidence that she did indeed suffer a broken arm. Of course, if her team called her doctor, he could testify that she suffered a broken arm, since that's not hearsay.

    • Daniela Filipa
      Daniela Filipa 10 ай бұрын

      @Kat Yaneshthe team is not a joke, they just dont have nothing to prove that amber is the victim, so they try with the articles, and btw everyone should be ashamed to bully these lawyers, its their job, and probably they though that amber as the real victim and now they are in this situation.

    • BlackFalkon
      BlackFalkon 10 ай бұрын


    • Ivan Kucerak
      Ivan Kucerak 10 ай бұрын

      @Kalin Simovski it’s alright buddy, no hard feelings.. this trail doesn’t really have much of an impact on my life being single and all lol (no risk of IDV for now) and i’ve only seen few videos.. commented on this one - which i don’t normally do.. and comment got couple of likes.. from what i’ve seen, it looks like she is lying about a lot, but he’s been all over the place with his addictions.. that’s my take on it.. but i understand the impact of it, in terms of how future cases might be viewed.. i certainly have no skin in the game when it comes to the lawyers - i see this as more of a media theatre/battle, than a standard court case

    • Kalin Simovski
      Kalin Simovski 10 ай бұрын

      @Ivan Kucerak The fact is I won't find you making this criticism about any other lawyer/case, you didn't even notice that the petitioner here does it quite a lot.
      However, I really shouldn't have assumed you are projecting here. Lots of ppl give hot takes about this. Sorry about that.

  • Juan R
    Juan R 10 ай бұрын +19

    At the rate at how fast Amber heards attorney speaks and just throwing questions to every person they cross examine, you would think they in a hurry to go somewhere. Like allow these people to speak. What kind of tactic is this? Asking a man questions on articles and expect him to give a straight answer on it is absurd on so many levels. This is so pathetic. Until they can allow these witnesses a decent chance to answer properly as its their right to do so lawfully, Amber's legal team shouldn't be allowed to ask questions.

  • madison_vp
    madison_vp 10 ай бұрын +361

    “the smarty pants who wrote that”
    “Netflix is a joke”
    “if that’s what it says that’s what it says”
    “No i missed that one-“
    “again johnny depp talks with irony..”
    this guy is so funny and fresh. i love it.

    • Harshitha Keerti
      Harshitha Keerti 2 ай бұрын

      Did she have a second husband??

    • Yo momma
      Yo momma 9 ай бұрын +1

      @Thomas Benjamin don't be creepy

    • Thomas Benjamin
      Thomas Benjamin 10 ай бұрын

      Anyone who is having a bad day will smile after looking at your pictures. You must be very special, what an amazing look.

    • Thomas Benjamin
      Thomas Benjamin 10 ай бұрын

      OMG! You're such a beautiful woman.

    • Deaf King
      Deaf King 10 ай бұрын +20

      "Was that written by the 2nd most underpaid actor?"

  • Bobbi Spliedt
    Bobbi Spliedt 10 ай бұрын +87

    I love how they're trying so hard to prove Johnny Depp has struggled with addiction. He's never tried to hide it. He has even talked about it in TV interviews.

  • DAkota O.b
    DAkota O.b 10 ай бұрын +64

    Her attorneys are a joke. I would never have them try to defend me because they try to make things something and it end up looking desperate and foolish . They can’t be taken seriously, why did they take on Amber in the first place when they saw there was little to nothing to defend ? Possibly because they may have thought there’s a chance she won’t be found guilty and they get their share. Who knows

    • David Luong
      David Luong 10 ай бұрын +1

      Everyone says that until their liberty/money/reputation is on the line.

    • JZ
      JZ 10 ай бұрын +3

      They don't have a case to defend though, they're defending something non existent so it's hard

  • Lola Loves
    Lola Loves 10 ай бұрын +72

    Articles of random journalists’ opinions on his movies are being used as major evidence? This is so embarrassing.

  • Selina Ray
    Selina Ray 11 ай бұрын +8655

    It's amazing how much nonsense this judge has allowed, how disappointing.

    • Ginette Cardinal
      Ginette Cardinal 10 ай бұрын +1

      ​@Yeah The bOis At last ! A true explanation of the role of the judge presiding a trial : it is called a trial because the parties involved are the ones making their own cases, the jury has to listen to the evidence to make a decision and the judge is master of the law and proceedings. No bias at all here, just sound administration of justice.

    • Ethan Thompson
      Ethan Thompson 10 ай бұрын +1

      Or when she allowed that awful lawyer to bully those poor witnesses! That was hard to watch. I actually do like the judge but I wish she did more on preventing all the unprofessionalism from AH team

    • FeastsandFires
      FeastsandFires 10 ай бұрын

      @Jeremy the Graten Even little things can add up to be significant over a period of time. Giving slight leeway here, giving slight leeway there…in the end it can help out a lot, especially in cases where it’s a close-call.

    • KCSe7en
      KCSe7en 10 ай бұрын

      This is how court is now

    • JackOfAllTrades
      JackOfAllTrades 10 ай бұрын +1

      I mean, the court is keeping time. So these useless questions are literally wasting their time as well as making them look bad. As far as I'm concerned this is good for JD's team

  • Dillw Gav
    Dillw Gav 9 ай бұрын +2

    This cross question is laughable at best and shameful at worst. I would be astonished if this attorney is retained by anyone after this lawsuit.

  • Lisa MB
    Lisa MB 7 ай бұрын +5

    Richard seems like such a stand up guy. I really liked him as a witness.

    • Johnny Depp
      Johnny Depp 5 ай бұрын

      ❤️Thank you for your utmost love and support you have consistently shown me in such difficult moments. I’m forever grateful. I really appreciate your unconditional love to me and every effort exerted by you to cause a change…Where are you watching from?

  • Steven Heymann
    Steven Heymann 10 ай бұрын +246

    "Does she have another husband?"
    Knowing that Heard has lied about pretty much everything, she probably does.

    • The Amber Heard Playlist!!
      The Amber Heard Playlist!! 10 ай бұрын +2

      I just put up 'This Is The Only Video You Ever Need To Watch About Johnny Depp And Amber Heard'

  • Eric Huus
    Eric Huus 10 ай бұрын +30

    I love how the attorney gets choked up when the judge calls him out for interrupting the witness’s answer to the question 🤣

  • GrayFox3D
    GrayFox3D 10 ай бұрын +15

    It’s almost impossible to not have anything negative seen about you when you’re as big as Johnny.

  • Carlton The Pug
    Carlton The Pug 10 ай бұрын +10857

    This comical court case is making Johnny Depp’s popularity soar instead of bringing hate to him.
    Good job Amber👏🏽👏🏽

    • sam head
      sam head 10 ай бұрын +1

      @BuckleBlockGamer neither am i

    • Athalfuns - Antes morrer livres que em paz sujeitos
      Athalfuns - Antes morrer livres que em paz sujeitos 10 ай бұрын

      Maybe that's the whole reason it is still going.

    • Moon God
      Moon God 10 ай бұрын +2

      Didn’t realize it’s supposed to bring hate to an innocent man in these days where women get away with claiming acts of violence/crime with no proof and get away with it .

    • aswari iskandar
      aswari iskandar 10 ай бұрын

      This lawsuit is airtight. Even if he lose the 50 mill, he get public opinion on his sides and popularity back.

    • Olde England 🇬🇧
      Olde England 🇬🇧 10 ай бұрын

      @Paula Pickett Me too

  • fever dream
    fever dream 10 ай бұрын +52

    Its amazing that there hasn't been an article about awful and overpaid lawyer. That guy would lead the hall of shame

  • APL Lu
    APL Lu 10 ай бұрын +12

    Every star gets a mix of good and bad press. But this Op-Ed was definitely something far different. And to have lost two $20 million franchise movie roles over unfounded accusations shows it was truly a beast of an article.

  • Oginaka
    Oginaka 10 ай бұрын +31

    I would've immediately called out every single one of those articles as heresay. I'm surprised they even allowed them to be used for evidence against him. Pathetic.

    • D M
      D M 10 ай бұрын +2

      It's not hearsay, for the reason below (copying my answer from above):
      There's an exception to the hearsay rule here (actually it's not even an exception -- by definition it's not hearsay). What is said in the articles is not being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in those articles (e.g., whether or not Johnny was drunk for example); rather, it's being used as an example of negative publicity. This is why Depp's lawyers aren't objecting. Trust me, they would if they could, and they have objected to hearsay many times.
      Hearsay would be, for example, Amber Heard testifying "My doctor told me I suffered a broken arm from being hit" -- because she's offering an out of court statement ("My doctor told me I suffered a broken arm from being hit") as evidence that she did indeed suffer a broken arm. Of course, if her team called her doctor, he could testify that she suffered a broken arm, since that's not hearsay.

  • Mella
    Mella 10 ай бұрын +10

    It’d be great to have that attorney actually allow the witness to finish answering

    GO AWAY 9 ай бұрын +12

    Interesting how the lawyer called Johnny’s last movies flops. I wasn’t aware of a single movie of his being a flop, some were better than others but to call them flops? Absolutely absurd. That’s a disgusting insult to every single person involved with those movies.

  • Elizabeth Anderson
    Elizabeth Anderson 11 ай бұрын +7202

    The fact that these lawyers are going off on “posts/articles” made from people who have never once spent a second with both or either one of these people as facts is laughable. Anyone can write anything to get a second of recognition or infamy

    • 名無名的
      名無名的 10 ай бұрын

      @Me Here They're not hearsay because the lawyer isn't using them to establish truth (of what's in the article) just as evidence that JD had lots of bad publicity (true or false) before AH article. The point that the witness is making is that the types of behaviour described in those articles is normal for hollywood and factored in when a studio hires them. Domestic Violence however (AH's article) is an entirely different matter and much worse publicity.

    • Me Here
      Me Here 10 ай бұрын

      ​@Yoga Journey Basically The Daily Telegraph newspaper had to pay Geoffrey Rush $2.9 million for defaming him after it published a news story claiming he acted inappropriately towards a female co-star during a King Lear theatre production (or "king leer" as they titled it in the paper) & the person who made the alligation was found not to be credible. The paper found another woman who was also willing to make claims against Rush, but the court refused to allow that to be added onto the case & appeal court upheld the decision & payout amount. He'd actually asked for just $50,000 & an apology, but Murdock/his paper didn't respond, so it went to court & he got nearly $3million from it.
      So that's one pirates star defamation win for what the court found to be false aligation, lets hope Johnny can follow

    • Yoga Journey
      Yoga Journey 10 ай бұрын

      @Me Here I'm not really familiar with that case so I'll have to read up on it.

    • Yoga Journey
      Yoga Journey 10 ай бұрын

      @YouDaMANRAJ Yeah, that"s what I was trying to say, although you expressed it way more clearly.

    • Yoga Journey
      Yoga Journey 10 ай бұрын

      @Don’t mind my PFP 😂

  • ChaChaDancin
    ChaChaDancin 10 ай бұрын +127

    “You would agree that… right?” Is that leading the witness? Glad that no objections were made. This was funny to listen to.

    • Dynasty 1989
      Dynasty 1989 10 ай бұрын

      that was basically an objection to smart defense . lmfao

    • Unknown Channel
      Unknown Channel 10 ай бұрын

      @D M exactly

    • D M
      D M 10 ай бұрын +21

      You can ask leading questions during cross-examination. You cannot ask leading questions of your own witnesses on direct examination.

  • Amelia
    Amelia 10 ай бұрын

    I’m not even being questioned and this dude is raising my blood pressure.

  • Nick Janse
    Nick Janse 10 ай бұрын +1

    watching johnny smile throughout all this gives me life

  • Kaylee
    Kaylee 10 ай бұрын +128

    “We’re talking about Johnny Depp’s reputation.” Dude if you wanna know his reputation, just look at the video of Johnny leaving the court room with all his fans giving him gifts.

  • Ryan Essex
    Ryan Essex 10 ай бұрын +8

    The fact the lawyer is asking such repetitive questions over and over again about something which is relatively unimportant is in itself a sign of desperation.

  • TD291
    TD291 10 ай бұрын +9791

    I really hope the jury isn't taking these questions seriously. Shouldn't questions about tabloid articles fall under a hearsay objection?

    • tabora _
      tabora _ 2 ай бұрын

      @MaybeGodwillsaveMe .......the whole point of this is for a jury to decide...... you're legally not allowed to see the jury when it's being publicized like this. They're entitled to privacy and anonymity

    • Shirley Rusaw
      Shirley Rusaw 2 ай бұрын +1


    • Donna Barney
      Donna Barney 7 ай бұрын +1

      This type of questioning throughout the trial really helped Johnny.

    • david marshall
      david marshall 9 ай бұрын +1


    • Warllockmaster asd
      Warllockmaster asd 9 ай бұрын

      @Blake Which funny enough has nothing to do with the Lawsuit itself, as the suit is about a specific article and it's malicious intent to defame him.
      Basically this was a diversion and an insult to the Jury's intelligence.

  • McScott76
    McScott76 10 ай бұрын +8

    The witness should refuse to answer the question unless presented with the article in question. Force the attorney to submit each and every article into evidence before asking the question. Not only would this further annoy the judge, but the jury would literally fall asleep waiting for him to trudge through all this nonsense.

  • MeMissy
    MeMissy 8 ай бұрын +2

    Rottenborn wasn’t far off, he based biggest part of his arguments on public statements and opinions. That’s the only content they managed to find for this trial 😂
    Well done JD, your life is an open book - they made fools of themselves 🙈🙈

    • Johnny Depp
      Johnny Depp 5 ай бұрын

      ❤️Thank you for your utmost love and support you have consistently shown me in such difficult moments. I’m forever grateful. I really appreciate your unconditional love to me and every effort exerted by you to cause a change…Where are you watching from?

  • shio otanashi
    shio otanashi 10 ай бұрын +38

    The lawyer here mentions, like, a million articles painting Johnny in such a bad light and yet doesn't even show any of the articles he was saying. Dear god, that begs the question if those articles actually did exist

  • deceiver
    deceiver 9 ай бұрын

    I keep coming back to this cross just to enjoy the the eloquence of this witness. Total class act and sure knows how to ridicule this lawyer's poor questioning

  • Bo Shek
    Bo Shek 9 ай бұрын +1

    I’ve never seen such incompetent lawyers before
    Their whole law firm is a joke

  • Michelle Lavellan
    Michelle Lavellan 10 ай бұрын +18

    I can't really understand how a lawyer can base his arguments on random articles found here and there...

  • Saad ur Rehman
    Saad ur Rehman 10 ай бұрын +26

    3:06 _"December of 2016, there's an article that says quote Johnny Depp is Hollywood's most over paid actor for the second year in a row. Did you recall reading that?"_
    _"was that written by the second uh...uhh underpaid actor?"_
    This had me laughing suddenly, even though I am half asleep!!
    And also _"I'm sorry, I haven't committed his IMDb page to memory..."_

  • Maxine Snow
    Maxine Snow 10 ай бұрын +23

    Yes, her lawyers are constantly interrupting I.. rudely but yet if a witness talks a little more than they expect (elaborate) they rudely tell a witness that THEY are interrupting??? Why are the other lawyers and the judge allowing that to happen?

    • Sandy Mcgill
      Sandy Mcgill 10 ай бұрын

      When their full of tou know what just let them spue more bile that way they can get caught out its simple lawyer tactics

    • Vilho Gottlieb
      Vilho Gottlieb 10 ай бұрын +2

      "When your enemy is busy making a mistake, don't interrupt them"--Vilho Gottlieb

  • Brandon Watson
    Brandon Watson 10 ай бұрын

    If they turned this court case into one of those Netflix limited series I would literally binge watch it

  • Zoe Antoinette
    Zoe Antoinette 10 ай бұрын

    Ugh it always scared me when people bring up the jury. The media and stuff is (I feel) mostly on johnnys side but then I worry because the jury is not seeing and not seeing all these comments that make you think about what we’re watching it’s just scary they might not have the ability to look at is as we do

  • Don Keyballs
    Don Keyballs 11 ай бұрын +3937

    For me personally, Amber's goal of trying to make the public hate Johnny and destroy his credibility has had the opposite effect.

    • Cas S
      Cas S 10 ай бұрын +1

      @Jordan Kelly I wouldnt say everyone but you still have a point. I'm glad he stood his ground for this, not just for his wellbeing and for justice but simply for the entertainment as well

    • Cas S
      Cas S 10 ай бұрын

      @ffnerd be glad about that, not annoyed at the repetition

    • Cas S
      Cas S 10 ай бұрын

      I think they call that karma 😎

    • ffnerd
      ffnerd 10 ай бұрын

      Yes, that is also the consensus by pretty much every single person aware of the happenings in the trial

    • Jordan Kelly
      Jordan Kelly 10 ай бұрын

      It honestly didn't. It worked, very very well at first. Everyone hated him, until this trial started

  • julie stewart
    julie stewart 8 ай бұрын

    This witness was the most honest down to earth you could wish for !

    • Johnny Depp
      Johnny Depp 5 ай бұрын

      ❤️Thank you for your utmost love and support you have consistently shown me in such difficult moments. I’m forever grateful. I really appreciate your unconditional love to me and every effort exerted by you to cause a change…Where are you watching from?

  • Sted Fast
    Sted Fast 10 ай бұрын

    I can’t believe that Amber heard and her attorneys came to court and had absolutely nothing!!! I would have killed to build a fly on the wall when they sat in the room with Amber before all of this and told her how she was going to come out the superstar and get all his money and everyone was going to feel sorry for her😂😂😂😂

  • darren osborne
    darren osborne 9 ай бұрын +15

    This line of questioning is beyond desperate.

  • Cam
    Cam 9 ай бұрын +2

    I am a kind of person who takes everything all in before responding and I have to say’ it seems to me like AH professional witness we’re found at the bottom of the trades, And JD’s professional witnesses were at the top the list of pros.

  • Susan Holbrook
    Susan Holbrook 10 ай бұрын +2

    Her lawyer is asking if the articles exist & his reply is that yes, they exist, but that it doesn't mean they are truthful and based on known facts. Her attorney sounds so confident during his failed attempt at asking rapid fire questions like Ms. Velaques during cross examination of Amber's witness'. HER ATTORNEY is so proud when asking some "we got'em now" questions without realizing his responses help to prove Johnny's claim and that her claims are lies.

  • Samantha Collier
    Samantha Collier 11 ай бұрын +3967

    This lawyer is disgusting. He keeps saying "you would agree" when he never outwardly says he agrees. This is a joke. This case is going to kill his career.

    • Rowgue51
      Rowgue51 10 ай бұрын

      @SuSu M
      You're allowed to ask leading questions on cross because it's assumed that the witness is hostile to you and that they're not going to volunteer information that helps your case. In fact if you're doing anything other than asking leading questions and insisting on a yes or no answer and nothing more during cross examination, every lawyer will tell you that you're incompetent and probably failing to provide effective assistance of counsel.

    • DJ Silversun
      DJ Silversun 10 ай бұрын

      @Timelens well they get money from Heard, thats it though. They're getting paid their normal rate, they won't get anywhere near the money that winning the case would get them which is the only thing that matters

    • Mafalda N
      Mafalda N 10 ай бұрын

      Like Beyoncé once said: Somebody’s getting fired.

    • DarkFamiliarity
      DarkFamiliarity 10 ай бұрын +1

      It's very common for lawyers to say "you would agree", and overall it's their job to be aggressive towards opponent so they can win case for their clients. Most people here never been in court room and don't know what they're even talking about.

  • Droitzel Glaedr
    Droitzel Glaedr 10 ай бұрын +7

    Oh my GODS, it's so mind-numbing to listen to that clown of a lawyer act like any old article posted by anyone can be used as proper ammo to defend their case. It's absolute nonsense.

  • Sue Condon
    Sue Condon 10 ай бұрын +3

    Love this man's incredulous expressions.

  • yumi loomerstorytime.
    yumi loomerstorytime. 10 ай бұрын +7

    How embarrassing. This is actually the lawyers PROFESSIONS!!

  • Carl Zeiss
    Carl Zeiss 10 ай бұрын +6

    I think that ending a question which is actually posed as a statement with a request for confirmation is a weak and somewhat pathetic technique for questioning a witness. If I was presiding over this case I would automatically dismiss any such evidence as a series of statements given by a biased counsel in pursuit of his goal and therefore largely irrelevant and generally absent from any judgement I might arrive at.

  • Harry Toeface
    Harry Toeface 10 ай бұрын

    I wonder if those lawyers realize what kind of damage this will do to their careers?

  • Van Artin
    Van Artin 11 ай бұрын +5062

    Amber’s lawyer tried to break this witness with ridiculous and pointless “hearsay”, but the witness did a great job by not busting out laughing.

    • Dusty Fox
      Dusty Fox 11 ай бұрын +1

      @Callan C The questions themselves are framed as questions on his own experiences. Also in cases like this a level of hearsay is permitted, just what sort is limited.
      He is framing the questions badly though as he's trying to antogonise the witness into damaging Depps character.

    • SueSuki
      SueSuki 11 ай бұрын +1

      @Rull Mourn the lawyer acting tough. 😁😆

    • Rull Mourn
      Rull Mourn 11 ай бұрын

      @Jeff ..That's pointless.

    • Rull Mourn
      Rull Mourn 11 ай бұрын

      @Dina Mihelios ..your comment is senseless.

    • Rull Mourn
      Rull Mourn 11 ай бұрын +3

      Her lawyer is a desperate crybaby.

  • Petra Deen
    Petra Deen 10 ай бұрын

    I believe that judge is putting on the poker face in court room until no one is around and then she burst out laughing and keeps laughing until the next day when she arrives to court room... and this is pretty much her life nowadays 😄

  • Diane Brooks
    Diane Brooks 10 ай бұрын +11

    Lost it at, "soooo are you just going to recite tabloid articles to me?"
    Lawyer: *yes*

  • Analytics97
    Analytics97 10 ай бұрын +6

    I have two questions. First, were these articles admited into evidence? Second, if someone says that they haven't seen something and the lawyer is asking whether they agree with the information presented in it, doesn't that call for a speculation objection?

    • Colie Braun
      Colie Braun 10 ай бұрын +4

      Depps team is letting the witness go because it makes them look better than objecting to everything and because this witness in particular is handling himself just fine lol

  • Heart Speaks 💕
    Heart Speaks 💕 10 ай бұрын +1

    From 2:36 on…. I couldn’t stop laughing! 😂 He can’t possibly be a real attorney!

  • Syah Tree
    Syah Tree 10 ай бұрын +3

    Johnny is a legend, legends never die, they only become greater❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • orez point
    orez point 10 ай бұрын +5326

    I like how the judge is allowing us to see that these lawyers have NO CASE, suck at what they do and loose emotional control while on the job. I think she's doing a service by letting us and jurors see workers like this, they are terrible at what they do.

    • Vincent Frusci
      Vincent Frusci 10 ай бұрын

      @orez point yea that’s true too

    • Vincent Frusci
      Vincent Frusci 10 ай бұрын

      It’s not that they’re terrible at what they do, it’s just that they have no evidence, so they have to resort to these tactics. If it were any other case, they might do a good job, but in this case they have nothing to work with, so they’re just trying to hard, and it’s not looking good for them.

    • Nev Mi
      Nev Mi 10 ай бұрын +1

      @Clayton Courtney thank you! great comment.

  • Jeb Adibus
    Jeb Adibus 10 ай бұрын

    It just amazes me that these lawyers are reading headlines as if they were facts.

  • Flakey
    Flakey 9 ай бұрын +11

    it's hilarious how desperate and defeated the lawyer sounds when he's not getting the answers he wishes then proceeds to interrupt and raise his voice. this lawyer is garbage and the jury will remember the way he presents himself

  • wtf wtf
    wtf wtf 10 ай бұрын +7

    This is harassment! Amber and her lawyer should be thrown out of the court immediately

  • Vujicic Linus
    Vujicic Linus 10 ай бұрын +29

    She wrote an article about being a domestic violence relationship but didn't tell them who?
    Meanwhile she was married to Johnny.
    "Did she have another husband?" She didn't refer it to Johnny, who else could it be?

  • Nilssön Åkerlund
    Nilssön Åkerlund 10 ай бұрын +27

    The judge should have stepped in here and said "enough." What a waste of time.

  • Jeni EL J
    Jeni EL J 11 ай бұрын +4407

    How can this type of hostile questioning keep going?? It’s pathetic and unprofessional! AH’s lawyers are plain rude.

    • karolabatiiis
      karolabatiiis 11 ай бұрын

      Lo que pasa es que estan deseperados

    • MrJackydragon
      MrJackydragon 11 ай бұрын

      @Jeni El J
      It's normal behavior for defense lawyers in a civil suit.

    • Sarah Zachary
      Sarah Zachary 11 ай бұрын +1

      I honestly think the annoyance of her lawyers would lose this for her 100% if she had ANY leg to stand on. Which she doesn’t

    • Brawndo
      Brawndo 11 ай бұрын +1

      Probbaly why there are not much objections on JD side. They let them sink themselves.

  • Malachi Gallagher
    Malachi Gallagher 10 ай бұрын

    I just want to give Johnny a big hug and tell him it will be ok.

  • Stoplight
    Stoplight 10 ай бұрын +25

    I'm confused on what Amber's team is trying to achieve here.
    "Do you agree that this random news outlet wrote an article about Johnny?"
    Like what do they expect as an answer? Yes newsoutlet69 made an opinionated article in 2014, so what? You can't exactly deny that news articles about Johnny Depp exist. I literally don't know what the attorney was trying to argue here.

    • Eric Lord
      Eric Lord 10 ай бұрын +1

      AH's lawyer is trying to play down the negative effect of her op-ed on JD's reputation and career by digging up obscure published articles expressing negative opinions about JD. In other words, he's desperately clutching at straws. Pathetic.

    • Stoplight
      Stoplight 10 ай бұрын

      @ravenchain85 That makes sense actually. Still dislike Heard tho lol

  • Ess Rhee
    Ess Rhee 8 ай бұрын +1

    What is wrong with this lawyer?!? Omg he’s insane

  • Ally Ocampo
    Ally Ocampo 10 ай бұрын

    I can't help but notice that Johnny don't often look at his witnesses, unlike Amber who keeps staring at them very intently. The only time I saw Johnny looks at his witness for a long while was his sister, and his eyes was full of compassion for her.

  • martin aakervik
    martin aakervik 9 ай бұрын

    The fact that to win in court seems more important than getting witnesses perspective so it's possible to understand what has really happen, is going to sink justis like Titanic ...long term. But I'm really happy Johnny was listened to. The behavior of the juridic system towards all the witnesses (on both sides) was to me a disgrace. It looked more like a sport event trying to hit points, listening to the lawyers.

  • SuperWowStyle
    SuperWowStyle 10 ай бұрын +1259

    Everytime rottenborn speaks, he makes a stronger case for depp.
    It’s almost like he is working for depp, just from the other side, hehe!
    I like that the judge and depps lawyers are letting him badger and misbehave. More public sympathy for depp, when we see what madness Amber Herd is capable of bringing to the table.

    • Emelem Red
      Emelem Red 10 ай бұрын +1

      @Professor Ding Dong I looked it up and it appears it was in fact Ben Rottenborn who objected his own question

    • Professor Ding Dong
      Professor Ding Dong 10 ай бұрын +1

      @David Bak we need his name...i only call him "Lawyer Object His Own Questions Guy" ...can you drop his name...i want to give it to my future kids..

    • Kian
      Kian 10 ай бұрын +2

      Everytime he speaks he’s just making sure he can read 😭

    • David Bak
      David Bak 10 ай бұрын +3

      Its not rottenborn, this is the guy who objected to his own question earlier in trial. He’s an embarrassment, does anybody know his name?

    • Katie P
      Katie P 10 ай бұрын +1

      That's not Rottenborn

  • Solaris Chronos
    Solaris Chronos 10 ай бұрын

    RESPECTS TO THE JUDGE for letting this go....

  • Twiztii _
    Twiztii _ 10 ай бұрын

    Yes, JD had negative publicity before the op-Ed as do so many A list celebrities but it has never derailed his career before. These articles that AH’s lawyer are bringing up were being planted into the tabloids but tabloids are now and have always published bull crap articles without ever finding out if sources are legitimate. That op-ed was specifically targeting JD even though she didn’t use his name. She has caused her own downfall and deserves for her career to be over

  • Nick Samuel
    Nick Samuel 10 ай бұрын +15

    ❌ counts of lying under oath
    ❌ counts of assault
    ❌ counts of false allegations
    ❌ counts of defamation
    And whatever the charge is for shitting in someone's bed.

  • Cjr Rob
    Cjr Rob 9 ай бұрын +3

    Ever get the feeling that this lawyer just wants his questions presented to jury rather than expecting witness to answer? He sounds ridiculous.