Thunderous applause well earned. Contemporary Socrates. You bet I was thrilled out of my academic mind to chance upon him at a Henry Ford College faculty lounge luncheon in the early 90s. (Good spread, too.) I was only 1 at table who knew his work on linguistics. Exploited that advantage for all it was worth. 2 hours of playing Locke to his Descartes. Have an autographed copy of ATS 2 prove it.
@Dimitry Raskolnikov He believes in innate ideas- linguistic universals/'depth grammar'- that makes him a Cartesian, his acknowledgment of which began our discussion. Read his debate with Skinner. Language acquisition cannot, according to Prof. Chomsky, be fully explained as a form of learned behavior. The basis of it must be basic acts that we perform naturally, such as associating sights and sounds: See dada, say 'dada'.
Why would Chomsky be, "playing Descartes?" Chomsky is an Empiricist (Locke) not a Rationalist (Descartes.) You must have had some momentary dyslexia when you made this You Tube comment.
Take A Moment Jester Moon here from Untruedaux Land. These guy are standing on the shoulders of giants. Professor Norm Chummy is on the top of all heads in his field. Thank you my friend Your work will live on Stay Safe Stay Free 🌐
I though that the inner "I" ...a stream of consciousness, a spontaneous flow of emotion -is brilliance brought forth, with ease, comprehensive and comprehensivable. If you missed or misunderstood his narrative don't blame him on your own lack of lucidity. Professor Chomsky is the first Professor who has not failed miserably toward a difficult subject matter. He has parsed it so that every-one can understand it if one is care-full.
Given the infinite possibilities of Language’s ability to stimulate Creativity and Understanding, no wonder Noam Chomsky chose to specialize in linguistics.
If I had the opportunity to ask one question of Noam Chomsky it would be: Mr. Chomsky, have you ever noticed how all of us seem to exist in the midst of a Language that communicates to us through form? I mean to say the world around us is in fact a Language communicating to us? The things we see and perceive outwardly exist inwardly and evoke thought in us?
Chomsky can go as far as to the different dimensions. If one can concentrate in everything he says, it is equivalent to traveling from one place to another in such a short period in different times..
"Charles Sanders Peirce: Our reasoning in science and ordinary life is guided by adductive principles that crucially limit the range of hypotheses we are currently capable of entertaining." "There are limits to the range of human understanding." Noam Chomsky
Noam claims our language didn't change much in the last 100,000 years, but when we find our expressions from 500 years ago they differ from those 2000 years ago.
My sacrifice 🙏🏻, I couldn’t find any words to explain. It’s when I listened, seeing and do focusing , it’s the picturesque views sensory. I wrote what’s I sensed emerged innermost. How’s great my sacrifice 🙏🏻, as something crystallized from absorbing by myself experiences. It’s not complicated it’s naturally with what’s you seeing and writing with feeling inside 😊. It’s the focus on what’s going on next as the basic life of man is the Same what’s like or dislike, hate or happiness. It’s selfish ways of being selfish in my observation the mostly of destructive ways of each other’s 😊.
46:48 the difference might be that in addition to the external world, humans live in a vast internal world of sensory memories and as well as intellectual memories and concepts. Just like machines, humans might in fact be compelled to say the things that they say, rather than being only inclined. But neither we ourselves nor observers of us are aware of the hidden internal memory state of a mind brain system. An then there is the effect of errors in memory as well as in associations between memories that further complicates the predictability of human thought and language.
27:00 "The language capacity evolved quickly and hasn't changed since, leading to the belief it is quite simple" That ties in nicely with Jeff Hawkins 1000 brains theory. The neocortex is doing the same thing everywhere - whether it is vision or touch or smell or language. That a small system evolved then repeated itself is Jeff's theory. Once evolution hit on an information processing model, it just repeated it across the whole cortex.
Reminds me of a year sequence in college on Language and Human Behavior, Limits of Language, and Language and Metaphor delivered by S. John Macksoud. Reminds me independently of Mary Parker Follett's Creative Experience. Not to mention Charles Sanders Peirce's expansion of logic as abduction and so in ways, pretensions aside, still hardly understood. Brilliant.
Any conversation about language goes off the rails when somebody tries to put it in the context of "talking robots", for example if one person is speaking from the standpoint of better writing or poetry and the other is an AI enthusiest. I know about Chomsky enough to know that he is speaking about how people get along with each other, and he has probably built very few robots. LinkedIn is the hub of robot-mania.
@ Uploader or other contributors; is there any way to upload this GREAT Video again in a HIGH resolution & even MOST importantly though if the SUBTITLE could be added too (ideally as a [.srt])?
Organization of mind and brain has to be understood to corelate language followed by result oriented action.Galolian language elevated human society to the path of progress.This century has more to offer and Noam Chomsky is the GUIDE.
Organization of mind and brain has to be understood to corelate language followed by result oriented action, is applicable to animals, when faced by some danger an animal makes a sound understood by all other animals to corelate a particular animal and a particular danger calling for actions accordingly. Once a cat had all seven kittens transferred to another location, but the cat re located all seven kittens to another place of her choice, proving they can count.
All I learned from this is that we have a soul which is the puppeteer and that the language of the thought or brain is different than the language of communication just like in the case of microprocessors while understanding only binary but communicating using others. Am I close?
The reason for the 'bird' and 'book' issue of expression versus understanding, could be they are complete sentences that can use either end to lock it in their meanings. The floating 'instinctively' and 'which book' can be at start or end to match the ends of 'swim' and 'read'. Intactness evidenced by book ends, and assertive by repeating the book end at either end. It looks like a hormonal sensory-motor factor to expression, pushy.
Chomsky is one of the best lenses by which to grasp the nature of things. He is in good company with the best scientists, philosophers, and literary folk (especially Shakespeare) of the species. It is interesting that the most quoted public American intellectual is not on NPR, or on TV. In the 1920s he would have been jailed, as was Bertrand Russell for his suggestion that Britain stay out of WW I. Gadflies, like great artists, are routinely ignored by the ruling class until after they're dead.
What blew my mind was: 'limited hypothesis space' vs 'inference to the best explanation'; as well as children 'sampling (?)' various languages/dialects before they settle on one.
Would anyone be able to tell me whether (at around 38.05) whether Chomsky is referring to (and critiquing) the work in the vein of George Lakoff and embodied cognition? i.e. what is the "great deal of work comparing organisation of actual speech, and organisation of other actions" that Chomsky critiques?
I needed to listen to this more than once The bits of language and language capacity are great Some of the other bits are so-so. I can't work out if he thinks all thoughts are linguistic or symbolically based It sounds like it at times To me this seems like old fashioned nonsense You don't need to consider neuroscience or Neural nets Just consider a standard computer running a traditional program analsysing pictures for shapes At the level of 'thoughts' of the program they are not all symbols
What was the spelling of the Psanish physician philosopher he mentioned around 12:45 who described three levels of intelligence. I tried googling “Juan horte” but my results weren’t what I was looking for
Most profs in the world are not known at all. Academic guest speakers are usually introduced in that manner. No need in Chomsky's case but thats just how its done.
Usually, the more intelligent the introducer, the less time they spend on intros. We all know who Chomsky is, and if you're smart, you know we dont care about you, blabbermouths. The more time you spend grandstanding, the less time people have to ask questions.
@Robert Stewart lol, he just a linguist and does not spread inaccessible knowledge. But I have seen him at his ~50 and there is no doubt that he has been way better and pellucid
I enjoy Chomsky’s linguistics/philosophical talks/views far more than his political sermons and social critiques. He should stick to what he’s good at, instead of vehemently defending the leftist dictators and treacherous regimes around the world.
His critiques of the conveyance of US hegemony, the promulgation of America empire as done so, and the mis-steos along the road to greatness and well as potential downfall if not self ruination are most prescient as BOTH lessons AND warnings. One must strive not to miss the key points,. which are more well researched and read into by Chomsky moreso than by virtually anymore else; but ALSO we must not fail to discern the spirit of the message, which is that of a true patriot and humanitarian. Miss that, amongst other tremendously important aspects, AND we risk losing out altogether - especially with regards to the worthiness of one of our greatest minds and a most prolific thinker researcher author speaker and intellect. So, let us not be TOO hasty, reductionist, nor sour. It pays NOT to reject simply because One doesn't like the sound or feeling of the message. Better to consider than to shut down the discourse, debate, and synthesis. At least, for the work, the effort, the analyses - Respect.
@Sweet Brown Good good, i kinda overslept and the weather is the unmotivated kind of snowing. Thanks for asking, hope you doing well too! I guess it's only polite to ask too: Are you doing well and how is the weather over there?
7:29 folks. The intro was like most intros, a lot of unnecessary personal information and intellectual gate crashing. REMEMBER THE FOLLOWING THREE WORDS: SHORT AND SWEET.
youtoober2013 It seems, we don’t really need language to communicate, but we sure need thoughts to communicate. But then again, what exactly is a language or a communication, is it a message or an understanding?
+dontzenyourselfout: Chiding me for not being able "even remotely understand what Chomsky is truly saying" , is not quite in accordance with your comment elsewhere here that Chomsky is, "...utterly unlistenable. He's become a croak." Further, it is not braggadocio to claim the ability of spatial visualization without the assistance of language. It is not a universal ability, but nor is it uncommon.
Chomsky's acknowledgement that thought does not require language comes as no revelation to any designer/craftsperson. I visualize a design. I do not think, "The base will be curved". Instead, during the design process, in the example given, I will visualize an unnamed curved form. To communicate the design idea to others I will use written and spoken language, and I will use the language of mathematics to describe the curve, and I will use the language of drawing. However, none of the symbol systems of language, mathematics, or drawing are needed to visually apprehend, think about, and modify the design idea in my own mind. Of course writing this comment necessitates that I use language to think, but it doesn't follow that all thought requires language.
Am I correct to say the challenge in reference to language is: how can 25 or so sounds create an unlimited number of words, sentences, communicative structure and thought?
something arbitrarily gifted to an individual or entity, or an honor entitled to some x (being an object, institution, or otherwise independent entity)
Talking about the evidence of the evolution of human language capacity within the time periods 60.000 years..?? Who on earth can conduct such surveys?? With what accuracy?..🙄🤔 Any help?..
sooner or later Lord Noam Chomsky will be born a girl or a boy who will churn out or better offer you the "discovery" of many mathematical and physical quantum formulas so it will be at that moment that "new languages" will be born ....... .... all thanks to GOD THE ETERNAL FATHER OUR LORD! 04/25/2020
Thunderous applause well earned. Contemporary Socrates. You bet I was thrilled out of my academic mind to chance upon him at a Henry Ford College faculty lounge luncheon in the early 90s. (Good spread, too.) I was only 1 at table who knew his work on linguistics. Exploited that advantage for all it was worth. 2 hours of playing Locke to his Descartes. Have an autographed copy of ATS 2 prove it.
@Dimitry Raskolnikov it's flipped, he's a rationalist, not an empiricist
@Dimitry Raskolnikov He believes in innate ideas- linguistic universals/'depth grammar'- that makes him a Cartesian, his acknowledgment of which began our discussion. Read his debate with Skinner. Language acquisition cannot, according to Prof. Chomsky, be fully explained as a form of learned behavior. The basis of it must be basic acts that we perform naturally, such as associating sights and sounds: See dada, say 'dada'.
Why would Chomsky be, "playing Descartes?" Chomsky is an Empiricist (Locke) not a Rationalist (Descartes.) You must have had some momentary dyslexia when you made this You Tube comment.
You’re a very lucky person my friend.
this is my first time seeing the simultaneous translation to sign language in an academic lecture, wonderful job!
T6o
Take A Moment Jester Moon here from Untruedaux Land.
These guy are standing on the shoulders of giants.
Professor Norm Chummy is on the top of all heads in his field.
Thank you my friend
Your work will live on
Stay Safe
Stay Free 🌐
I though that the inner "I" ...a stream of consciousness, a spontaneous flow of emotion -is brilliance brought forth, with ease, comprehensive and comprehensivable. If you missed or misunderstood his narrative don't blame him on your own lack of lucidity. Professor Chomsky is the first Professor who has not failed miserably toward a difficult subject matter. He has parsed it so that every-one can understand it if one is care-full.
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
Given the infinite possibilities of Language’s ability to stimulate Creativity and Understanding,
no wonder Noam Chomsky chose to specialize in linguistics.
I love Professor Chomsky. A true genius and one of History's greatest Homo sapiens.
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
Amazed by his wisdom..
If I had the opportunity to ask one question of Noam Chomsky it would be: Mr. Chomsky, have you ever noticed how all of us seem to exist in the midst of a Language that communicates to us through form? I mean to say the world around us is in fact a Language communicating to us? The things we see and perceive outwardly exist inwardly and evoke thought in us?
Chomsky can go as far as to the different dimensions. If one can concentrate in everything he says, it is equivalent to traveling from one place to another in such a short period in different times..
"Charles Sanders Peirce: Our reasoning in science and ordinary life is guided by adductive principles that crucially limit the range of hypotheses we are currently capable of entertaining."
"There are limits to the range of human understanding." Noam Chomsky
Noam claims our language didn't change much in the last 100,000 years, but when we find our expressions from 500 years ago they differ from those 2000 years ago.
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
Pointing out concision or?...
My sacrifice 🙏🏻, I couldn’t find any words to explain. It’s when I listened, seeing and do focusing , it’s the picturesque views sensory. I wrote what’s I sensed emerged innermost. How’s great my sacrifice 🙏🏻, as something crystallized from absorbing by myself experiences. It’s not complicated it’s naturally with what’s you seeing and writing with feeling inside 😊. It’s the focus on what’s going on next as the basic life of man is the Same what’s like or dislike, hate or happiness. It’s selfish ways of being selfish in my observation the mostly of destructive ways of each other’s 😊.
46:48 the difference might be that in addition to the external world, humans live in a vast internal world of sensory memories and as well as intellectual memories and concepts. Just like machines, humans might in fact be compelled to say the things that they say, rather than being only inclined. But neither we ourselves nor observers of us are aware of the hidden internal memory state of a mind brain system. An then there is the effect of errors in memory as well as in associations between memories that further complicates the predictability of human thought and language.
It starts at 7:30
thank you, i was at 2:30 about to blow a gasket
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
gosh thank you
And Chomsky, in his trademark fashion, skips the pleasantries and gets right to the lecture at hand.
You saved me 7:00 minutes (30 secs went for writing this comment)
27:00 "The language capacity evolved quickly and hasn't changed since,
leading to the belief it is quite simple"
That ties in nicely with Jeff Hawkins 1000 brains theory.
The neocortex is doing the same thing everywhere - whether it is vision or touch or smell or language.
That a small system evolved then repeated itself is Jeff's theory.
Once evolution hit on an information processing model, it just repeated it across the whole cortex.
You’ve made it in academia when there’s two people introducing you.. 😂😂😂
Yea the video should simply starts from when the real speaker starts his speech
I really wish those people would stfu, frankly. The ego it must take.
and they quoted others with even more praise =)
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
Reminds me of a year sequence in college on Language and Human Behavior, Limits of Language, and Language and Metaphor delivered by S. John Macksoud. Reminds me independently of Mary Parker Follett's Creative Experience. Not to mention Charles Sanders Peirce's expansion of logic as abduction and so in ways, pretensions aside, still hardly understood. Brilliant.
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
Why Noam Chomsky does not have a Nobel Peace Prize is a mystery.
He doesn't need it, wouldn't want to take it from another--very humble.
imagine trying to sign interpret this in real-time
Any conversation about language goes off the rails when somebody tries to put it in the context of "talking robots", for example if one person is speaking from the standpoint of better writing or poetry and the other is an AI enthusiest. I know about Chomsky enough to know that he is speaking about how people get along with each other, and he has probably built very few robots. LinkedIn is the hub of robot-mania.
hi, I wonder if there is a transcript for that talk, thank you.
@ Uploader or other contributors; is there any way to upload this GREAT Video again in a HIGH resolution & even MOST importantly though if the SUBTITLE could be added too (ideally as a [.srt])?
Organization of mind and brain has to be understood to corelate language followed by result oriented action.Galolian language elevated human society to the path of progress.This century has more to offer and Noam Chomsky is the GUIDE.
Organization of mind and brain has to be understood to corelate language followed by result oriented action, is applicable to animals, when faced by some danger an animal makes a sound understood by all other animals to corelate a particular animal and a particular danger calling for actions accordingly. Once a cat had all seven kittens transferred to another location, but the cat re located all seven kittens to another place of her choice, proving they can count.
Starts at 7:32
Amazing intelligence.
Laser light sees through it all--not one thing escapes his understanding.
SUBTITLE please!!
All I learned from this is that we have a soul which is the puppeteer and that the language of the thought or brain is different than the language of communication just like in the case of microprocessors while understanding only binary but communicating using others. Am I close?
The reason for the 'bird' and 'book' issue of expression versus understanding, could be they are complete sentences that can use either end to lock it in their meanings. The floating 'instinctively' and 'which book' can be at start or end to match the ends of 'swim' and 'read'. Intactness evidenced by book ends, and assertive by repeating the book end at either end. It looks like a hormonal sensory-motor factor to expression, pushy.
Bravo!
Yes, Bravo.
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
Chomsky is one of the best lenses by which to grasp the nature of things. He is in good company with the best scientists, philosophers, and literary folk (especially Shakespeare) of the species. It is interesting that the most quoted public American intellectual is not on NPR, or on TV. In the 1920s he would have been jailed, as was Bertrand Russell for his suggestion that Britain stay out of WW I. Gadflies, like great artists, are routinely ignored by the ruling class until after they're dead.
I need written transcript
What blew my mind was: 'limited hypothesis space' vs 'inference to the best explanation'; as well as children 'sampling (?)' various languages/dialects before they settle on one.
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
also cool that the purpose of language is thought not communication
Would anyone be able to tell me whether (at around 38.05) whether Chomsky is referring to (and critiquing) the work in the vein of George Lakoff and embodied cognition? i.e. what is the "great deal of work comparing organisation of actual speech, and organisation of other actions" that Chomsky critiques?
good discussion- I want the script of the talk. who will come forward to send to my mail.
I needed to listen to this more than once
The bits of language and language capacity are great
Some of the other bits are so-so.
I can't work out if he thinks all thoughts are linguistic or symbolically based
It sounds like it at times
To me this seems like old fashioned nonsense
You don't need to consider neuroscience or Neural nets
Just consider a standard computer running a traditional program analsysing pictures for shapes
At the level of 'thoughts' of the program they are not all symbols
"so this is kinda mild" what a boss. Man the US is a tough place lol.
@Sweet Brown some kind of machine learning exercise?
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
What was the spelling of the Psanish physician philosopher he mentioned around 12:45 who described three levels of intelligence. I tried googling “Juan horte” but my results weren’t what I was looking for
How did they communicate during Holocaust? By using aesthetics. Let's keep in touch :)
I'm speechless (I guess that was his aim)
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
MckennaCountrCulture .
K, say something smart then .
+MckennaCountrCulture
A more admirable aim would have been to spark intelligent discussion.
As I believe was the purpose of his talk.
Oh my God these intros, can't academics resist having 30sec of attention on behalf of the lecturer? No one goes to hear those guys, ever
you mean 4 minutes
I know! I just skip over it.
Most profs in the world are not known at all. Academic guest speakers are usually introduced in that manner. No need in Chomsky's case but thats just how its done.
Usually, the more intelligent the introducer, the less time they spend on intros. We all know who Chomsky is, and if you're smart, you know we dont care about you, blabbermouths. The more time you spend grandstanding, the less time people have to ask questions.
18:42 Would be interested in hearing this evidence
There come a time when I think it is a nightmare that such great people's minds disappear because of aging
@Robert Stewart lol, he just a linguist and does not spread inaccessible knowledge. But I have seen him at his ~50 and there is no doubt that he has been way better and pellucid
@Robert Stewart why are you logged in with your fake account, Noam ?
Noam may not be as energetic as his younger self but i assure you his mind is still working quite well.
Dr.G.Mary Sunanda, working at university, T.S, India, want the text of this speech.
That was nice! Now, back to cooking. I hope nothing got burned.
1:18:52 comment about the potential of machine learning (statistical learning)
Language is not the ultimate means of expression. Action is. Deed surpasses words. It has always been as such with the humanity.
👍🏻
I enjoy Chomsky’s linguistics/philosophical talks/views far more than his political sermons and social critiques. He should stick to what he’s good at, instead of vehemently defending the leftist dictators and treacherous regimes around the world.
His critiques of the conveyance of US hegemony, the promulgation of America empire as done so, and the mis-steos along the road to greatness and well as potential downfall if not self ruination are most prescient as BOTH lessons AND warnings. One must strive not to miss the key points,. which are more well researched and read into by Chomsky moreso than by virtually anymore else; but ALSO we must not fail to discern the spirit of the message, which is that of a true patriot and humanitarian. Miss that, amongst other tremendously important aspects, AND we risk losing out altogether - especially with regards to the worthiness of one of our greatest minds and a most prolific thinker researcher author speaker and intellect. So, let us not be TOO hasty, reductionist, nor sour. It pays NOT to reject simply because One doesn't like the sound or feeling of the message. Better to consider than to shut down the discourse, debate, and synthesis. At least, for the work, the effort, the analyses - Respect.
HOW HAS CHOMSKY NEVER HEARD OF JOHN DEE AND ENOCHIAN MAGIC OF THE 1500’s TO PRESENT
I think 95% of the audience is completely lost.
On the other hand, the audience asked some very good questions. It is necessary to be lost at first in order to understand new things.
Speaking of linguistics... 'Noam Chomsky' said in a nanosecond would be unintelligible :-) (1.00)
I'd like to witness an ego duel between Noam Chomsky and Neil de Grasse Tyson. I do think that Noam will win.
Describe to us all what ego is?
Tyson is no match, not even close , he is just a physicist
If we discover immortality in the near future plx use it on chomsky first.
U have said what has always been in my mind.
@Sweet Brown Good good, i kinda overslept and the weather is the unmotivated kind of snowing. Thanks for asking, hope you doing well too!
I guess it's only polite to ask too: Are you doing well and how is the weather over there?
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
Lol good old chomsky, "that was up to you, the people aka workers
Môže nám vysvetliť niekto kto koho zamuroval Čína Kóreu alebo USA Kóreu
7:29 folks. The intro was like most intros, a lot of unnecessary personal information and intellectual gate crashing. REMEMBER THE FOLLOWING THREE WORDS: SHORT AND SWEET.
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
interessant
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
1:15:44 Thought does not require language
youtoober2013 It seems, we don’t really need language to communicate, but we sure need thoughts to communicate. But then again, what exactly is a language or a communication, is it a message or an understanding?
thinking through feelings .. feelings through pictures .. pictures through language .. in both directions
^^
+dontzenyourselfout: Chiding me for not being able "even remotely understand what Chomsky is truly saying" , is not quite in accordance with your comment elsewhere here that Chomsky is, "...utterly unlistenable. He's become a croak." Further, it is not braggadocio to claim the ability of spatial visualization without the assistance of language. It is not a universal ability, but nor is it uncommon.
Chomsky's acknowledgement that thought does not require language comes as no revelation to any designer/craftsperson. I visualize a design. I do not think, "The base will be curved". Instead, during the design process, in the example given, I will visualize an unnamed curved form. To communicate the design idea to others I will use written and spoken language, and I will use the language of mathematics to describe the curve, and I will use the language of drawing. However, none of the symbol systems of language, mathematics, or drawing are needed to visually apprehend, think about, and modify the design idea in my own mind. Of course writing this comment necessitates that I use language to think, but it doesn't follow that all thought requires language.
If I ever run a seminar I will skip the host and the 2nd host and go straight to the main speaker.
I am lost on the Galalio Challenge. Can some one five me a basic definition?
Am I correct to say the challenge in reference to language is: how can 25 or so sounds create an unlimited number of words, sentences, communicative structure and thought?
1:07 and ON ABOUT AIRPLANES!!!!...the mechanical universe? no
8:00 What language is - Galilean challenge
7:32 bs intros end, Chomsky starts.
7:33
Emotional currency.
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
19:55
biological what?
didn't get the word after it
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
something arbitrarily gifted to an individual or entity, or an honor entitled to some x (being an object, institution, or otherwise independent entity)
pretty sure it's "endowment"
Let him know Godel Thm
This guy sold out on 911
spinoza's god
Talking about the evidence of the evolution of human language capacity within the time periods 60.000 years..??
Who on earth can conduct such surveys??
With what accuracy?..🙄🤔
Any help?..
Catalhoyuk videos might give you an idea, to look further.
zzzzzzz
sooner or later Lord Noam Chomsky will be born a girl or a boy who will churn out or better offer you the "discovery" of many mathematical and physical quantum formulas so it will be at that moment that "new languages" will be born ....... .... all thanks to GOD THE ETERNAL FATHER OUR LORD! 04/25/2020
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
Skip to seven and a half mins
200th.
Hello how are you doing today and how is the weather condition over there..?
Doda
Hey it's that crazy guy who thinks muslims did 911
@Abegaz Kebede I'm saying he's a lying controlled opposition shill who pretends crazed Muslims did 911